Calculating the Stark Effect (Spectral line splitting)?

HMS-776
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Is the equation for calculating the Stark effect the same for every atom?

I am trying to understand how to calculate the Stark effect for Oxygen but do not understand the formula.

Can someone please explain and show me how to calculate the Stark effect?

It would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's in practically every good textbook on quantum mechanics. There's also the wikipedia page, or the hyperphysics page.

Have you studied the prerequisite physics and math to learn this stuff? If you don't understand what the equations are supposed to mean, I'd have to think the answer to that is 'no'. In which case, why would you expect to understand it? And what would you expect people to do? Give a whole undergraduate course in physics within a forum thread?
 
Yes you're right.

I know very little physics, which is why I'm here. I am trying to determine which
wavelength(s) are needed to excite the oxygen atom to it's 4th energy level in a high voltage field containing plasma and ambient air.

The high voltage field is around 20kV. I need to first determine the V/cm. I know that the stark effect causes spectral line splitting. And the higher the e field the more splitting will be. I am just trying to determine or at least estimate what wavelengths I would need.

I know this in most cases would take more knowledge than I currently have to figure out, so I am trying to enlist the help of others.
 
Last edited:
HMS-776 said:
Is the equation for calculating the Stark effect the same for every atom?

I am trying to understand how to calculate the Stark effect for Oxygen but do not understand the formula.

Can someone please explain and show me how to calculate the Stark effect?

It would be greatly appreciated!

I am sure, you have many books or papers on the Stark effect.Now I am study the Stark effect too, but I find it is hard to find relative materials on it. Would you send some specially that one include the formula you mentioned above. Thank you.
My email dress is: wengguofeng@hotmail.com
 
There's no formula for calculating the Stark effect.

Think about it? There's no simple formula for calculating the electronic levels of an atom or molecule without an electrical field. There's not going to be one with a field. It's very difficult.

Here's an model approach, which I guess should at least show some of the difficulties involved:
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0402051
 
alxm said:
There's no formula for calculating the Stark effect.

Think about it? There's no simple formula for calculating the electronic levels of an atom or molecule without an electrical field. There's not going to be one with a field. It's very difficult.

Here's an model approach, which I guess should at least show some of the difficulties involved:
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0402051

Thank you for you indication, I will reconsider it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top