Callan-Symanzik equation for Effective Potential

In summary, the conversation discusses equations (13.24) and (13.25) in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT book, specifically the change from the Callan-Symanzik equation for the Effective Action to the Effective Potential. The relation for constant ##\phi_{cl}## is mentioned as ##\Gamma[\phi_{cl}] = -(VT)\cdot V_{eff}(\phi_{cl})##, equation (11.50) in the book. The conversation then goes on to discuss how to get from (13.24) to (13.25) using a discretized space and defining the quantity V(φ). It is mentioned that getting (13.25) should be obvious after going back
  • #1
thatboi
121
18
Hey all,
I am looking equations (13.24),(13.25) in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT book and I am confused about how they change from the Callan-Symanzik equation for the Effective Action to the Effective Potential. I thought the relation for constant ##\phi_{cl}## was ##\Gamma[\phi_{cl}] = -(VT)\cdot V_{eff}(\phi_{cl})##, equation (11.50) in the book. But making such a substitution into (13.24), I do not understand how to get to (13.25).
Any advice would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First imagine that the space is discretized, so that you can write
$$\int dx\, \phi(x)\frac{\delta}{\delta\phi(x)}\Gamma[\phi]=
\sum_{x=1,2,\cdots} \phi_x \frac{\partial}{\partial\phi_x} \Gamma(\phi_1,\phi_2,\ldots)$$
Then define the quantity
$$V(\phi)=\Gamma(\phi,\phi,\ldots)$$
Clearly
$$\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phi}=\sum_{x}\left(\frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial\phi_x} \right)_{\phi_1=\phi_2=\cdots=\phi}$$
so
$$\phi\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phi}=
\sum_{x}\phi\left(\frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial\phi_x} \right)_{\phi_1=\phi_2=\cdots=\phi} =
\left( \sum_{x} \phi_x\frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial\phi_x} \right)_{\phi_1=\phi_2=\cdots=\phi}$$
Finally turn back to the continuous ##x##, so that the last formula can be written as
$$\left( \int dx\, \phi(x)\frac{\delta}{\delta\phi(x)}\Gamma[\phi]\right)_{\phi(x) =\phi, \; \forall x}
=\phi\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phi}$$
Now getting (13.25) should be obvious.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and malawi_glenn

1. What is the Callan-Symanzik equation for Effective Potential?

The Callan-Symanzik equation for Effective Potential is a mathematical equation that describes the behavior of a quantum field theory at different energy scales. It is used to calculate the effective potential, which is a measure of the energy of a system at different energy scales.

2. How is the Callan-Symanzik equation derived?

The Callan-Symanzik equation is derived using the renormalization group, which is a mathematical technique used to study the behavior of physical systems at different energy scales. It involves integrating out high-energy degrees of freedom to obtain a low-energy effective theory.

3. What is the significance of the Callan-Symanzik equation for Effective Potential?

The Callan-Symanzik equation is an important tool in theoretical physics, particularly in the study of quantum field theory. It allows us to understand how a theory behaves at different energy scales, and can be used to make predictions about the behavior of physical systems.

4. How is the Callan-Symanzik equation used in practical applications?

The Callan-Symanzik equation is used in a variety of practical applications, such as in the study of phase transitions, critical phenomena, and the behavior of quantum field theories in different regimes. It is also used in the development of new theories and models in physics.

5. Are there any limitations to the Callan-Symanzik equation for Effective Potential?

Like any mathematical model, the Callan-Symanzik equation has its limitations. It is based on certain assumptions and approximations, and may not accurately describe all physical systems. Additionally, the equation becomes more complex when applied to systems with multiple interacting fields.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
861
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
871
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
868
Replies
1
Views
649
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
906
Replies
0
Views
710
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top