Calculating the Sun's Bending Angle on a Ray of Light

AI Thread Summary
When light passes near the sun, it experiences a bending effect due to the sun's gravitational field. The bending angle can be estimated using the formula 4M/R in natural units, where M is the sun's mass and R is the distance from the sun. The sun's mass can be derived from the Earth's orbital speed and distance, leading to a calculation of the bending angle. In metric units, the mass is calculated using the formula 4GM/c²R, which also results in the bending angle expressed in radians. The expected deflection of light near the sun is approximately 2 parts in a million, or a few microradians, indicating a very small but measurable effect. This phenomenon is consistent with the predictions of general relativity, showcasing the influence of massive bodies on the path of light.

A ray of light passing a million miles from the sun is bent...

  • 0 radians

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3.7 nanoradians

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3.7 microradians

    Votes: 5 100.0%
  • 3.7 milliradians

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
By how much, if at all, is a ray of light bent when it passes by the sun a million miles from center?

The bottom line is, do you have an order-of-magnitude feel for the sun's gravity? Can you judge the rough size of the bending angle well enough to spot it in the line-up?

In natural units (c=G=hbar=1) the answer is simply 4M/R radians, where M is sun's mass and R the distance of closest approach----a million miles being E44.

The sun's mass? Well the Earth's orbit speed is E-4 and its distance from the sun is 93E44 (93 million miles). So the sun's mass is 93E44 multiplied by the square of E-4.

The mass of a central body equals the radius of any circular orbit multiplied by the square of the orbit speed. This assumes the orbiter is small compared with the central body, and the Earth is that.

M, as you can see, is easy to find and the angle is simply 4M divided by E44.

The corresponding thing is messy in metric----distance 15E10 meters, orbit speed 3E4 meters per second, then divide by
G = 6.673E-11 cubicmeters/squaresecond per kilogram,
which gives the mass M in kilograms. Then the angle is 4GM/c2R, where R is the distance of closest approach.

What natural units do for you in this case is get rid of the Gees and the cees, making things a little less bother. The answer comes out in radians either way---doesn't matter whether you work in natural units or in metric.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The Sun as a black hole would have a Schwarzschild radius of 3 km. 1.5 million km is 500,000 times that, so you expect a deflection of the order of 2 parts in a million, or a few microrad.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top