Calculating Theoretical Transfer Efficiency for Wireless Energy System

  • Thread starter Thread starter redhot2k4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Wireless
redhot2k4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have built a wireless system as described at the following site http://www.ar2r.50webs.com/wte/wte.html"

I would like to be able to apply some theory to it and calculate a theoretical value for the transfer efficiency over certain distances

Does anybody have any idea of the theory I would need to use??

The Attempt at a Solution



In a paper by Andre Kurs, "Power transfer through strongly coupled resonances" he derives a formula for transfer efficiency from coupled mode theory however it is complicated and the coils he uses are self resonant, where as mine have a raised capacitive plate making them an LC resonant circuit

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Cheers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
redhot2k4,

Would it matter whether the coil was self-resonant or not? The self-resonant inductors still use capacitance, but it's part of the coil... I would think you could use the same formula.

Michael
http://www.starmanelectric.com
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top