Calculating Thermal Stress on Steel Train Rails: Winter to Summer Transition

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsalapide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stress Thermal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating thermal stress on steel train rails during seasonal temperature changes. Initially, the thermal stress was incorrectly calculated, but after reevaluation, the correct thermal stress on the rails at 35 degrees Celsius was determined to be -1.08x10^8 Pa. To prevent thermal stress, the minimum gap required between the rails when laid is calculated to be 5.4x10^-3 m. The calculations utilize Young's modulus for steel and its coefficient of linear expansion, confirming the importance of these parameters in determining thermal stress and necessary gaps. Accurate calculations are crucial for ensuring rail safety and integrity during temperature fluctuations.
jsalapide
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Steel train rails are laid in 10m long segments placed end-to-end. The rails are laid on a winter day when the temperature is -10 degrees Celsius.

a. if the rails are originally laid in contact, what is the thermal stress on them on a summer day when their temperature is 35 degrees Celsius?

b. To prevent thermal stress during summer, what minimum gap between rails must be left when they are originally laid?

my answer in (a) is -3.6x10^7

my answer in (b) is 1.8x10^-3

am i correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any work to back those answers up?
 
sorry it was the wrong one..

i resolved it and:

a. the young's modulus for steel is 20x10^10 and its coefficient of linear expansion is 1.2x10^-5..
i used the formula (F/A)=-(coefficient of linear expansion)(young's modulus)(delta T)
F/A is the thermal stress..
my answer is -1.08x10^8..

b. i just used the formula delta L=(coefficient of linear expansion)(original length)(delta T)

my answer is 5.4x10^-3 m

is that correct?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top