Calculating Time Dilation in a Relativistic Spaceship Passage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little PBrane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time dilation experienced by a spaceship traveling between two beacons, positioned 40 million meters apart, at a speed of 0.30c. Observers at the beacons time the passage, leading to confusion about the correct application of relativistic equations. The initial calculation suggests a time of approximately 465 milliseconds, but there is uncertainty regarding the reference frame for the distance measurement. It is proposed that if the distance is measured in the ship's frame, the problem becomes a relativistic one, while if measured in the observers' frame, it simplifies to a basic distance over speed calculation. Clarification on the reference frame is essential for accurate computation.
Little PBrane
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two fixed navigation beacons mark the approach lane to a star. The beacons are in line with the star and are 40 x 106 m apart. A spaceship approaches the star with a relative velocity of 0.30 c and passes the beacons. The passage of the ship between the beacons is timed by observers on the beacons. The time interval of the passage according to observers is closest to:

Homework Equations



The given distance between the star and the beacons=s=40*10^6 m

Velocity of the given spaceship=0.30 c

The passage of the ship between the beacons is timed by observers on the beacons

Δt=Δt0 /√(1 - v2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution



=(s/v)/√(1 - v2/c2)=(40*10^6 m/0.30c)√(1 - 0.302)
=0.44/0.954=0.465 seconds=465 ms
I think this is wrong. Answer choices given are:
470, 420, 250, 440, 170
Am I thinking this right? For the observer the time should be larger not smaller. 444ms ((4*10^6)/0.3c) would be the time inside the spaceship, correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the observers reference frame s=vt is always true.
 
The difficulty here is that you (or the problem) did not state in which reference fram the 40x10^{6}m is measured.

As Quinzio suggested you will not have to do any calculations to adjust the velocity of the ship... therefore if the 40x10^{6}m is given in the reference frame of the observers then this isn't even a relativistic problem.. you would just do d/v = t and be done with it..

However, I think it would make more sense if this was a relativistic calculation, so it's probably best if you assume that the distance 40x10^{6}m is actually measured in the reference frame of the ship.

So perhaps that will help you?
usually relativity problems are very good about specifying in what reference frame all measurements are made... but I guess not in this case.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top