Calculating Time Dilation on an Airplane in Special Relativity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating time dilation experienced by an observer on an airplane traveling at 1250 km/h compared to an observer on Earth. The user attempts to apply the time dilation formula, \(\Delta t' = \Delta t \gamma\), but struggles with rounding errors when subtracting large and small numbers. A suggestion is made to express the Lorentz factor \(\gamma\) using a binomial expansion for small velocities, as \(v/c\) is much less than 1. This approach aims to simplify the calculation of the time difference, which is the primary goal of the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately handling small values in relativistic calculations.
awygle
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An airplane travels 1250 km/h around the Earth in a circle of radius essentially equal to that of the Earth, returning to the same place.

Using special relativity, estimate the difference in time to make the trip as seen by Earth and airplane observers

Homework Equations



Time dilation:
\Delta t' = \Delta t \gamma

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to do this by saying that the time for an observer on the Earth is just t=d/v, and time for the observer in the plane is t'=t*\gamma, then doing t-t', but I cannot get a decent answer. I suspect rounding errors may be involved since I end up with really big numbers minus really tiny numbers? But I wanted to check to make sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
awygle said:
I suspect rounding errors may be involved since I end up with really big numbers minus really tiny numbers? But I wanted to check to make sure...
Those tiny numbers--the time difference--is what you want. Hint: To find 1 - γ, express γ as a binomial expansion in terms of (v/c)^2. Note that (v/c)^2 << 1.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
972
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top