Calculating Time in Special Relativity: Proper Time vs. Observer's Frame

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the time it takes for a meter stick moving at a speed of 0.8c to pass an observer, focusing on the concepts of proper time and the observer's reference frame in the context of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different approaches to calculating time using the Lorentz factor (gamma) and question the consistency of their results across different equations. Some express confusion about the relationship between proper time and the time measured in the observer's frame.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the use of proper time and the observer's measurements. Some participants have offered clarifications about the definitions and relationships between the variables involved, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with assumptions about which frame is measuring proper time and the implications of using different frames for length and time measurements. There is also mention of formatting issues with LaTeX in the discussion.

AriAstronomer
Messages
46
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The question goes: A meter stick with a speed of 0.8c moves past an observer. In the observer’s reference frame, how long does it take the stick to pass the observer ?

Homework Equations


Special Relativity: where T and L = proper time/length, t, l are not:

t = T(gamma)
l(gamma) = L


The Attempt at a Solution


So I calculate gamma = 5/3. Here's where I got messed:

I figured there are two ways to approach the time, one way is to do
v = l/T = l(gamma)/t. If you plug and chug with this though, you get the wrong answer, gamma is on the top.

If you use v = L/t = l/[(gamma)t], you get the right answer, since gamma is in the denominator here but in the numerator with the other equation. What makes you decide to use this one over the other one?? Is there something I'm messing up and they should yield the same answer??

Thanks,
Ari
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You messed up in the first part since T = (gamma)*t. You get the same answer in both cases.
 
Sorry for the non-latex. I'm looking at a definition right now for special relativity, and it says

[ tex ] t = \frac{ \tau}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} = \gamma \tau [ /tex ] where tau is proper time.

Thus, by using this method, \gamma = 5/3, t = 5/3 \tau, or \tau = 3/5 t.

Thus, (where L = proper length) in v = \frac{d}{t} = \frac{L}{\tau} = \frac{1}{(3/5) t},
we're going to end up with:
t = \frac{5}{3v}, which will give you the wrong answer...what am I doing wrong??

Why isn't my latex working??
 
Last edited:
Let's be clear about which frame is measuring a proper time.

Let the rest frame of the meterstick be the unprimed frame. The length in that frame is L (of course). Let's call the time Δt. Note that measurement of Δt requires readings from two synchronized clocks (one at each end of the stick) so it is not a proper time.

Let the frame of the observer be the primed frame. The length of the stick in that frame is L/γ. The time in that frame is Δt'. Note that Δt' is a measurement made on a single clock, so it is a proper time.

The relationship between the times is Δt = γΔt'.

You can use either frame to solve for Δt' and you should get the same answer.
 
t = \frac{ \tau}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} = \gamma \tau

There it is... the spaces inside the brackets were the problem.

Can't help you with relativity :P
 
Ahhh crap. Yeah makes sense. I stupidly assumed that L and T must correspond to the same frame, but whoever is making the measurement is T...

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K