Calculating Train Speeds Using Classical Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speeds of two trains using classical relativity. An observer sees the westbound train receding at 0.6c and the eastbound train at 0.8c, leading to various speed calculations based on different perspectives. The ticket collector on the westbound train, moving at 0.4c, complicates the calculations, particularly in determining the speed of the eastbound train relative to the westbound train. Participants clarify that using Galilean transformations, the speed of the eastbound train relative to the westbound train should be 1.4c, not 1.8c as initially suggested. The conversation highlights the importance of perspective in speed calculations and the nuances of classical versus special relativity.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
The classical kind, of course

If two trains leave a station o nteh same track. An observer missed both these trains and is standing clsoe to the track sees the westboun train recede at 0.6c and sees the eastbound train recede at 0.8c. There is a ticket collector on the westbound train going from the back of the train to the front at 0.4c, with respect to a passenger on the westbound train.


If the GALILEAN transformation equations were true then what would the speed of the eastbound train with respect to the westbound train (call it Ur) according to:

A) Observer on the station - i would say 1.4c because that what he sees, right?

b) Passenger seated on the westbound train - 1.4c becasue if he looked behind out hte window he would see the eastbound train go 0.8c + 0.6c away from him

c) Ticket collector on the westbound train (still walking from back to the front) - 1.8c (her speed 0.4c + speed of train 0.6c + speed of east train 0.8c)

Similarly what is the speed of the ticket collector:

d) according to the observer on the station - 1c - speed of the train + TC speed

e) according to passenger seated o tneh east train - 1.8 c


f) relative to a passenger seated on the east train according to to the observer on the station - 1.8c

remember this is using classical relativity, not special relativity, please tell me if i made any mistakes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at c) again.
 
jcsd said:
Look at c) again.
what's wrong with it??

the ticket collector is moving the back of the west train to the front at 0.4c while the train is moving at 0.6c in the same direction if she looekd back then she would see the east train move at train speed + her speed +east train speed, right?

what am i missing here?
 
Unless you missed out something in the original question, the question doesn't seem to be asking what speed does the ticket collecter see the train move at.
 
What jcsd is saying is that the question specifically asks "what is the speed of the east bound train with respect to the west bound train [\b] accoording to ...

In c, your answer is the speed of the east bound train with respect to the conductor. Using Galilean physics, everyone should say that the speed of the east bound train relative to the west is 0.8c+ 0.6c= 1.4 c.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What jcsd is saying is that the question specifically asks "what is the speed of the east bound train with respect to the west bound train [\b] accoording to ...

In c, your answer is the speed of the east bound train with respect to the conductor. Using Galilean physics, everyone should say that the speed of the east bound train relative to the west is 0.8c+ 0.6c= 1.4 c.

so am i right or what?? you just explained my own understanding, and thus if that were true then the collector who is movin at 0.4c westbound would see the speed of her, the train and the east train as the speed of the eastbound train's recedance
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top