Calculating two masses colliding

  • Thread starter Thread starter Denton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Two masses
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time taken for two equal masses in space to collide due to gravitational attraction. The original poster integrated the formula a = GM / R^2 to derive a time estimate of approximately 70 years for two 1-tonne masses separated by 1 km. Respondents pointed out that the integration method used was unclear and emphasized the importance of correctly applying the equations in the context of gravitational dynamics. They suggested using a center of mass approach and provided a more detailed method for deriving the time to collision. The overall consensus indicates that the initial calculations may be incorrect without a proper integration process.
Denton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
I have been wondering for a long time now on how to calculate the time taken for two masses in space to collide by force of gravity.

Now what I've basically done was integrate the formula a = GM / R^2 between the two points corresponding to the distances appart from the masses (assuming the masses are equal.) And with the acceleration, T = sqrt ( 2S / a ) (S being the distance between masses).

And I've gotten values of, say two 1 tonne masses at a distance of 1 Km would take approx 70 years to collide with each other.

Now I've got no idea whether I've gotten it right, or I am way off. It seems like a fair answer (then again they only weigh one tonne).

Can anyone confirm my working is correct and or what I am doing wrong. Thanks

-Denton.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Denton said:
I have been wondering for a long time now on how to calculate the time taken for two masses in space to collide by force of gravity.

Now what I've basically done was integrate the formula a = GM / R^2 between the two points corresponding to the distances appart from the masses (assuming the masses are equal.) And with the acceleration, T = sqrt ( 2S / a ) (S being the distance between masses).
HOW did you integrate that? That's the crucial point and you don't say. You can't just integrate the two sides independently- the right is a function of R and the left side is a derivative with respect to t.

And I've gotten values of, say two 1 tonne masses at a distance of 1 Km would take approx 70 years to collide with each other.

Now I've got no idea whether I've gotten it right, or I am way off. It seems like a fair answer (then again they only weigh one tonne).

Can anyone confirm my working is correct and or what I am doing wrong. Thanks

-Denton.
Again, I can't say what you are doing wrong because you don't say what you did! Simply saying you "integrated" an equation doesn't help since I don't know how you tried to itegrate it.

Here's how I would do that problem: First I'm going to put it in the "center of mass" system. Since the two objects have the same mass that will be the point exactly half way between them. If r is the distance from each mass, the distance between the two masses is 2r so we have, for each mass, dr^2/dt^2= -GM/4r^2. Since the independent variable "t" does not appear in that explicitely, we can reduce the order of the equation by letting v= dr/dt. By the chain rule, dr^2/dt^2= dv/dt= (dv/dr)(dr/dt)= v(dv/dr) so the equation becomes v(dv/dr)= -GM/r^2 for v as a function of r. We can write that as vdv= -(GM/4r^2)dr and NOW integrate the left side with respect to v and the right side with respect to r. We get (1/2)v^2= GM/4r+ C. (If you move the "GM/4r" to the left side and multiply by M, you might recognize that as "conservation of energy".) If, initially, v= 0 and r= R, C= -GM/4R and we have v= dr/dt= \sqrt{GM/4r- GM/4R}= (\sqrt{GM}/2)\sqrt{1/r- 1/R}= (\sqrt{GM}/2R)\sqrt{(R-r)/r}. That can be separted as \sqrt{r/(R-r)}dr= \sqrt{GM/2R}dt. I don't have time now to complete that but if what you did is not like that, it's probable that your result is wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top