Calculating Uncertainty of an intrinsic function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the value and uncertainty of the equation S = 2d sin(θ) using given values for d and θ. The participant initially encounters a high relative error of 77% in their uncertainty calculation, which raises concerns about their methodology. They apply the root mean squared method for uncertainty but realize they mistakenly used degrees instead of radians for the angle θ. After correcting this error and converting the angle uncertainty to radians, the calculated uncertainty becomes more reasonable. The key takeaway is the importance of unit consistency in calculations involving trigonometric functions.
sam400
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to calculate the value and the uncertainty of the equation \begin{equation} S = 2d \sin(\theta) \end{equation} (one side of the Bragg formula), however, the final answer is strange, so I would like to know what I'm doing wrong.

Homework Equations


My $\theta$ value: $17.5^{\circ}$
My $d$ value: $4.28 \pm 0.03$ cm
As far as I know, for an intrinsic function, the uncertainty is the root mean squared of the differential, so
\begin{equation} \Delta S = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial a} \Delta a \right)^{2} + \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial b} \Delta b \right)^{2} } \end{equation}

The Attempt at a Solution



After plugging in the numbers and taking the derivatives, the formula that I get is:

\begin{equation}\Delta S = 2 \sqrt{( \sin\theta \Delta d)^{2} + (d \cos\theta \Delta \theta)^2} \end{equation}

For S, I get about 2.60 cm, which is more or less what I expected, but for $\Delta S$, I am getting a value of about 2, which means a relative error of 77%, so there is probably something wrong with what I did.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What value did you use for ##\Delta \theta##?
 
Most frequent error in this context is using degrees instead of radians.
 
Oops, I just realized I have been using degrees for my values. Now my error is more sensible. I had 0.3 degrees for my angle uncertainty, but it wasn't converted to radians.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top