Calculating Variables for Bending a Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter EternityMech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Bend
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the bending of a beam, key variables include the length, weight of the object, width, thickness, weight of the beam, Young's modulus, and the position of the object on the beam. Gravity is not a separate variable to consider since the object's weight already accounts for gravitational effects. Additionally, understanding the boundary conditions, or how the beam is supported, is crucial for accurate calculations. These factors collectively determine the beam's response to bending. Properly accounting for all variables ensures precise analysis of beam deflection and stress.
EternityMech
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
How many variables would i need?

I already know the

1.Length of beam
2.Weight of object on beam
3. Width
4.Thickness
5. Weight of beam
6. Young's module
7. Gravity? (not sure since the weight of object already has gravity and the same weight on the moon not mass would make it bend the same way am i right?)

What am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Position of object on beam?
 
You would also need to know the boundary conditions (how the beam is supported).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Base Motion and Vertical Beam - Basic Reaction Forces?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Size Effect on Structural Strength
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Two beams joined after bending
Replies
9
Views
2K
I How to calculate the "weight" of this piece of metal?
Replies
12
Views
1K
Engineering Bending Moment for Simply Supported, Overhanging Beam with two Overhangs
Replies
4
Views
3K
Calculate the residual stress on a beam after bending
Replies
30
Views
7K
Calculating the bending stress of a simply supported beam
Replies
5
Views
6K
I How to Calculate force exerted on a falling body?
Replies
12
Views
3K
I Apparent Weight problem (falling beam)
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Effective weight vs distance to the point of attachment of the weight
Replies
11
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top