Calculating Variance: Add X & Y To Get 32*Var[X] + Var[Y]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter waealu
  • Start date Start date
waealu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a quick question about variance.

If you are trying to compute Var[3X-Y] where Var[X]=1 and Var[Y]=2,
the correct formula is 32*Var[X] + Var[Y],
but why do you add the variances of x and y?

If you were computing Var[3X+Y] would it also be 32*Var[X] + Var[Y] ?

Thanks, Erik
 
Physics news on Phys.org
waealu said:
Hi, I have a quick question about variance.

If you are trying to compute Var[3X-Y] where Var[X]=1 and Var[Y]=2,
the correct formula is 32*Var[X] + Var[Y],
but why do you add the variances of x and y?
Your textbook probably has a theorem about Var[X + Y] and Var[kX]
waealu said:
If you were computing Var[3X+Y] would it also be 32*Var[X] + Var[Y] ?
Yes.
 
Hey waealu.

For the proof, the easiest way is to use VAR[X] = E[X^2] - {E[X]}^2 and then prove the identity. You do it for the continuous and discrete cases and you'll get the same result for both.

Intuitively though, the variance is a squared positive quantity which means that the variance has to always increase (and recall that variances are always positive for a random variable).
 
waealu said:
Hi, I have a quick question about variance.

If you are trying to compute Var[3X-Y] where Var[X]=1 and Var[Y]=2,
the correct formula is 32*Var[X] + Var[Y],
but why do you add the variances of x and y?

If you were computing Var[3X+Y] would it also be 32*Var[X] + Var[Y] ?

Thanks, Erik

These are only true if X and Y are independent (or, at least, uncorrelated) random variables. For independent (or uncorrelated) X and Y and constants a, b we have
\text{Var}[aX + bY] =a^2 \text{Var}(X) + b^2 \text{Var}(Y).

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top