Calculating Vertical Acceleration from Centripital enduced movement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating vertical acceleration resulting from centripetal force as a ball moves upward along a Y-axis. The user seeks clarification on whether centripetal force is responsible for the ball's upward movement and how Newton's Third Law applies, specifically regarding the equal and opposite force generated. There is a request for guidance on calculating the force produced by the ball's movement through the Y plane. The scenario assumes the ball can move freely up or down a rotating arm, influenced by changes in rotational speed. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
sl235
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was unsure how to describe what I wanted using words alone so I created a GIF to help.

k7rF6T.gif


Or view here - http://makeagif.com/i/k7rF6T

I am pretty unschooled in the world of physics so please forgive my lack of understanding.

Firstly, the force that would cause the ball to move to the top of the structure is centripetal force correct?

As the ball moves upwards through the Y axis, according to Newtons Third Law, as the ball moves upwards it is creating an equal force downwards?

How would the force generated by the movement of the ball through the Y plane be calculated?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just for clarity, assume the ball has a hole in the center and has the freedom to move up or down the arm as the speed of the rotation increases/decreases.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top