Calculating Visibility of a Circular Structure on a Flat Earth Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter e-realmz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
To determine the visibility of a circular structure on a flat Earth surface, one must calculate the distances to the horizon for various heights of the structure. The foundation at 0 feet, the beginning of the slope at 3,200 feet, and the peak at 4,500 feet require different calculations based on observer height. Using Pythagorean theorem is suggested for these calculations, assuming a spherical Earth model for accuracy. The discussion emphasizes the simplicity of the geometry involved, indicating that advanced mathematical concepts are unnecessary for this problem. Understanding these calculations is essential for determining visibility distances effectively.
e-realmz
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I do not know if this would be the right thread for this forum but I have a few questions.

On a surface exactly equal in all properties on Earth but lacking in any properties which would create poor or limited visibility at any distance including trees, mountians or level differences, there is a circle structure exactly 4,500 ft. high. It is 66 miles in diameter from 0 to 3,200 ft. From 3,200 ft. to 4,500 ft., it evenly slopes until it reaches a center point at the top.

With that information, I need to know how far (in miles) would one have to be for the following *points of this structure to be exactly visible on the horizon.

*0+ (Structures foundation)
*3,200+ (Beginning of slope)
*4,500 (Structure no longer visible)

Could anyone answer that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If I understand correctly what you are asking then you just need to find the distances to common horizon of both the observer and the observed point and add them. Pythagoras will accomplish that.
 
Well it's not differential geometry and nor tensor analysis. I'd say it's more like elementary geometry. As long as you assume Earth to be spherical.

Daniel.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top