Calculating Water Volume for Energy Storage in Electric-Power Plants

  • Thread starter Thread starter bosox3790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric
AI Thread Summary
Electric-power companies utilize water for energy storage by pumping it from a lower reservoir to a higher one using reversible turbine pumps. To calculate the volume of water needed to store energy produced by a 115 MW power plant in one hour, potential gravitational energy must be considered. The formula used is E = m * g * h, where E is energy, m is mass, g is gravitational acceleration, and h is height. After calculations, the estimated volume of water required is around 7000 cubic meters, but there are discrepancies in the calculations presented. Clarification on the correct approach and values is needed to resolve the confusion.
bosox3790
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Some electric-power companies use water to store energy. Water is pumped by reversible turbine pumps from a low to a high reservoir. To store the energy produced in 1.0 hour by a 115 MW (115 106 W) electric-power plant, how many cubic meters of water will have to be pumped from the lower to the upper reservoir? Assume the upper reservoir is 600 m above the lower and we can neglect the small change in depths within each. Water has a mass of 1000 kg for every 1.0 m3.

This problem has completely confused me. How do I do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much energy is produced in one hour by a 115 MW electric power plant?

Then, consider the energy is being stored as potential gravitational energy. So what is the potential energy of the water? From here, you should be able to solve for the mass of the water
 
We know the potential energy and calculate the mass of the water that has to be transported."1.0 hour by a 115 MW (115 106 W) "

E=115106 W
H=600m
m=?

E=m*g*h <=> m=E/g*h

115106/9.82*600*1000 ~ 7032953/1000 ~7000 m³
 
I tried that and it doesn't work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top