Calculating Wavelength Using Diffraction Grating

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the wavelength of light using a diffraction grating, the setup involves measuring the distance from the grating to the light source and the distance between the zero order and first order maxima. In this case, with a distance of 1m from the grating and 0.5m between the maxima, the angle theta is determined to be 26.6 degrees. Using the formula m*wavelength=d*sin(theta) with a grating of 1000 lines per cm, the calculated wavelength is 4.48*10^-4 cm. It is noted that the grating's specifications, including the number of lines per cm, are typically provided, which is essential for accurate calculations. Understanding these principles is crucial for successfully determining the wavelength in a lab setting.
GelatinGhost
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I'm going to have a lab final on diffraction gratings tomorrow, and I want to make sure I have the right idea. Basically we need to find out the wavelength of an unknown light using a diffraction grating.

So let's say the grating is perpendicular to the light, and the distance from the grating to the light is 1m. The distance from the zero order line (the light source?) and first order line (first maxima on the right?) is .5m. That would mean that theta is 26.6 degrees, correct? And with 1000 lines per cm (1/d), the equation m*wavelength=d*sin(theta) would be as follows:

1*wavelength=(1/1000)*sin(26.6)

making wavelength=4.48*10^-4 cm. Is this correct?

Also, is it possible to find wavelength without d? Because I'm not even sure if we're going to be given it or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That seems fine. If you're doing an experiment the grating should have on it somewhere how many lines it has per cm etc.
 
Alright, thanks a lot!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top