Calculating Weight Savings with Rectangular Section Beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the weight savings when using a rectangular section beam instead of a square section beam for a cantilever beam application. The original square beam dimensions yield a maximum bending stress of 30 MPa with a width of 182 mm. When considering a rectangular beam with a depth twice its width, the intuitive assumption of a 50% weight reduction is challenged, as the calculated weight savings is actually 29.6%. Participants emphasize the need for proper calculations using the moment of inertia formula for rectangular sections, while addressing the relationship between width and depth. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding structural mechanics to accurately determine weight savings and load-bearing capabilities.
MMCS
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
Here is the original question, i know the first answer as 182mm

A square section cantilever beam, 3 m in length, carries a concentrated load of 10 kN at its free end. If the maximum bending stress is not to exceed 30 MPa determine the minimum dimensions of the section.

Ans 182mm,

What would be the percentage saving in weight if a rectangular section beam, having a depth equal to twice its width, were to be used instead?

Intuitively it seems there would be a weight reduction of 50% if the width dimension was halved however I have the answer to be 29.6%, does somebody know how i would get to this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you show some calculations and see if the answer pops out.
 
MMCS said:
Intuitively it seems there would be a weight reduction of 50% if the width dimension was halved
Equally intuitively, it would have half the load bearing capability. There would have to be a corresponding increase in depth.
 
How would i use this in the fomula? To solve the first question i used I to be x*x^3/12, but now because it is of rectangular cross section i would use b and d, however this gives me two uknowns
 
You know a relationship between breadth and depth. From the OP, assume D = 2*B
 
Here is my working, i am a few percent off, can you see any mistakes?
 

Attachments

  • working.png
    working.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 572
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top