Calculating Work Done by a Variable Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter ecthelion4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables Work
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by a variable force F=bx^3, where b is 3.7 N/m^3, one must recognize that the force changes with position, making the simple multiplication of force and distance insufficient. Instead, the correct approach involves using integration to account for the variable nature of the force over the distance from x=0.0m to x=2.2m. The definite integral of the force function from 0 to 2.2m yields the total work done. The final calculation results in 21.6 J, which rounds to 22 J. Understanding how to apply integration in this context is crucial for solving similar problems.
ecthelion4
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A force F=bx^3 acts in the x-direction. How much work is done by this force in moving an object from x=0.0m to x=2.2m? The value of bis 3.7 N/m^3


Homework Equations



Work=Force*Distance


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok since the above equation is true, then the problem would solution would be obtained by simply multiplying our force which is (3.7N/m^3) by the given distance which would be 2.2m. The thing is that once you do that, the problem is over and there is still a variable there bothering us which is x^3. What am I supposed to do with that variable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(3.7N/m^3)

This is not the force, this is a constant. The force is b*x^3. Since it contains the x^3 term, the force is variable and you can't use W=Fd. Do you know integration?
 
yes, but how would i use it in this case?edit: ok i figured it out, it should be the definite integral from 0-2m of F right?
 
Last edited:
ecthelion4 said:
yes, but how would i use it in this case?


edit: ok i figured it out, it should be the definite integral from 0-2m of F right?

Yes, but the upper limit is 2.2m, right? :smile:
 
that was exactly it. The answer was 21.6 which rounded up to 22J . Thanks you were a great help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
778
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
765
Back
Top