Calculating Work Due to Gravity on a Mars Spacecraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninjagowoowoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Work
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required for a spacecraft to move from a 1650 km to a 4740 km orbit above Mars, the formula used is work = G(M_s)(M_m)(1/R_2 - 1/R_1). The user is reminded to ensure all units are correctly converted, specifically kilometers to meters, and that the answer should be in joules. It is noted that the calculation should reflect the change in total energy rather than just potential energy. For accurate results, users are encouraged to derive the total energy for a circular orbit or refer to previous posts for guidance.
ninjagowoowoo
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
A spacecraft of mass 3120 kg is in a circular orbit a distance 1650 km above the surface of Mars. How much work must the spacecraft engines perform to move the spacecraft to a circular orbit that is 4740 km above the surface?

So I have work = change in energy
so
work= G(M_s)(M_m)(1/R_2 - 1/R_1)

or work = (6.673*10^-11)(3120)(6.41*10^23)(1/(3.4*10^6 + 4740000) - 1/(3.4*10^6 + 1650000)


Does this look right? Or am I missing something stupid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, method looks right to me. Just remember the units!
 
For some reason it's still not correct. The only units that I converted were the km -> m. Is there anything else that I needed to convert? OH and my answer should be in joules.
 
Last edited:
ninjagowoowoo said:
For some reason it's still not correct. The only units that I converted were the km -> m. Is there anything else that I needed to convert? OH and my answer should be in joules.

Looks to me like you have calculated the change in potential energy and set that equal to the work. The work should equal the change in total energy. Total energy is not too hard to derive for a circular orbit. In fact I posted it within the last few days on another thread. See if you can do it yourself, and if not search my posts to find it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top