Calculating Work to Stop a 1000 kg Car at 100 km/hr

  • Thread starter Thread starter rueberry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Work
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required to stop a 1000 kg car traveling at 100 km/hr, the kinetic energy formula KE=1/2mv^2 is used, assuming no friction. The speed conversion from km/hr to m/s is crucial, with 100 km/hr equating to approximately 27.7 m/s. After calculations, one user arrives at 383,645 J, while the book states 386,000 J. The discrepancy arises from the book using a more precise conversion factor for speed. Accurate dimensional analysis is essential for obtaining the correct value in joules.
rueberry
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
How much work is required to stop a 1000 kg car traveling at 100 km/hr?

I was going to use KE=1/2mv^2 , since the work should equal the KE, assuming no friction.

I have: =1/2(1000 kg)(100km/hr)^2

I was using dimensional analysis to make the conversion to m/s, so I end up with J, but I think I'm doing something wrong in the conversion.

(1000 km/hr)(1000 m/1 km)(3600 sec/1 hr)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rueberry said:
How much work is required to stop a 1000 kg car traveling at 100 km/hr?

I was going to use KE=1/2mv^2 , since the work should equal the KE, assuming no friction.

I have: =1/2(1000 kg)(100km/hr)^2

I was using dimensional analysis to make the conversion to m/s, so I end up with J, but I think I'm doing something wrong in the conversion.

(1000 km/hr)(1000 m/1 km)(3600 sec/1 hr)
To get Joules, the conversion factor from km/hr to m/s is: 1000/3600 = .277. 1 km/hr = .277 m/sec; 100 km/hr = 27.7 m/sec.

AM
 
When I work that problem out, I get 383645J, but the answer in the book says 386,000J. Am I doing something wrong? If I use 27.7 m/sec in the equation, I get

1/2(1000kg)(27.7m/sec)=383645
 
The book is using the ratio 100*1000/3600 [=27 7/9] and not the approximation 27.7 m/s.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top