Calculating Workdone on a Helix using W=Integral F.Tds

  • Thread starter Thread starter cutemimi
  • Start date Start date
cutemimi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use W=Integral F.Tds
To find workdone when a particle is moved along the helix x=cost, y=sint, z=2t from (1,0,0) to (1,0,4pi) against a force F(x,y,z)=-yi+xj+zk = -sinti+costj+2tk ( substituting above)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let rt = costi+sintj+2tk
r't= -sinti+costj+2k

Therefore W= Intergral(0tp4pi)[ <-sint,cost,2>.<-sint,cos t,2t>=Intergal[sin^2t+cos^2+2t] = [t+2t^2]from 0 to 4pi

Giving the answer 4pi+32pi^2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cutemimi said:

Homework Statement


Use W=Integral F.Tds
To find workdone when a particle is moved along the helix x=cost, y=sint, z=2t from (1,0,0) to (1,0,4pi) against a force F(x,y,z)=-yi+xj+zk = -sinti+costj+2tk ( substituting above)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let rt = costi+sintj+2tk
r't= -sinti+costj+2k
Therefore W= Intergral(0tp4pi)[ <-sint,cost,2>.<-sint,cos t,2t>=Intergal[sin^2t+cos^2+2t] = [t+2t^2]from 0 to 4pi

Giving the answer 4pi+32pi^2

Be careful here: you are integrating the work with respect to the value of the parameter t. What is the value of t at the endpoint of this helical path? (It's not 4·pi.)
 
Please assist...I am lost
 
You can't be all that lost: it looks like your work integral is set up correctly.

The path that the particle travels on is a helix (an ascending circular spiral) starting at (1, 0, 0) and ending at (1, 0, 4·pi). The parametric equation for this path is given as x = cos t, y = sin t, z = 2t . You said you're starting the path integral at t = 0, which corresponds to x = cos 0 = 1 , y = sin 0 = 0 , z = 2·0 = 0 , which checks against the starting coordinates. So what value must t have for the ending coordinates? That is the value you would end your integration of the dot product (1 + 4t) at.
 
I get the point, and I am now using 2pi as the ending coordinate. My next dump question is having (-1,0,4pi) not (1,0,4pi) when i apply 2pi to the parametric equations.
 
zimbob said:
I get the point, and I am now using 2pi as the ending coordinate. My next dump question is having (-1,0,4pi) not (1,0,4pi) when i apply 2pi to the parametric equations.

cos(2·pi) = ?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top