Calculating X-M-X Angles in MX6 with Octahedral Geometry | P&C Method Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter mooncrater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
AI Thread Summary
In calculating the number of X-M-X angles in MX6 with octahedral geometry, the initial approach used combinations to find the total number of M-X-M bonds, resulting in 15. However, the correct answer is 12, as the solution considers only adjacent bonds when counting angles. The oversight arises from the interpretation of the question, which may imply counting only angles between adjacent bonds rather than all possible pairs. This distinction is crucial in understanding the expected methodology for such geometry problems. The discussion highlights the importance of clarity in problem wording to avoid confusion in angle calculations.
mooncrater
Messages
215
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


The question says:
Find the number of X-M-X angles in MX6, which has an octahedral geometry.

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


To do this question , I used p&c .
Since there are 6 X in MX6 and we have to choose two of them . Therefore total number of M-X-M bonds will be 6C2=15.
But the solution says that it is 12. When I saw it , I noticed that they had missed the opposite M-X-M bonds. So why had they(the solution makers) not counted those bonds? Are they wrong here ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't think of a good answer to your question. We typically speak only about angles between adjacent bonds, but technically counting angles between non-adjacent bonds is not a mistake if the question is worded just "count angles between bonds".
 
  • Like
Likes mooncrater
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top