Calculation of Complex Integral for Closed Curve with Poles at z=±2

  • Thread starter Thread starter player1_1_1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of a complex integral involving the function \(\frac{e^{2z}}{z^2-4}\) over a closed curve that encloses the poles at \(z=\pm2\). Participants are examining the implications of the poles and the appropriate methods for evaluating the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the structure of the integral and the presence of poles, with one participant questioning the disappearance of the exponential term in a previous attempt. Others explore the use of the residue theorem versus the Cauchy integral formula, considering the nature of the poles and the function's meromorphic properties.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the residue theorem, indicating a potential direction for evaluating the integral without reaching a consensus on the final method.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of evaluating integrals with singularities, and there is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the use of different mathematical tools in this context.

player1_1_1
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


count integral: \int\limits_C\frac{e^{2z}}{z^2-4}\mbox{d}z where C is closed curve containing z=\pm2

The Attempt at a Solution


\ldots=\int\limits_C\frac{e^{2z}}{(z-2)(z+2)}\mbox{d}z
so function has two poles z=\pm2 and integral will be
\ldots=\int\limits_{C_1}\frac{e^{2z}}{(z-2)(z+2)}\mbox{d}z+\int\limits_{C_2}\frac{e^{2z}}{(z-2)(z+2)}\mbox{d}z=4\pi i
corrrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No. Isn't this the same integral you already posted except now the circle encloses both singularities? How come the exp term has completed disappeared?
 
yeah, its the same integral. yeah, that what i have done is nonsense, it should have been
\ldots=\int\limits_{C_1}\frac{\frac{e^{2z}}{z-2}}{z+2}\mbox{d}z+\int\limits_{C_2}\frac{\frac{e^{2z}}{z+2}}{z-2}\mbox{d}z where C_1 is around z=-2 and C_2 is around z=2 and then \ldots=\frac{1}{-4}\cdot2\pi ie^{-4}+\frac14\cdot2\pi ie^4=\frac12\pi i\left(e^4-e^{-4}\right)
ok?
 
Yeah that works. But apparently you already know the residue theorem, so why are you using the Cauchy integral formula. If the function is meromorphic with simple poles, as is the case here, you can obtain the integral via the residue formula by inspection.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K