Calculation of the change in internal energy of water

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the change in internal energy of water when it is vaporized at 1 bar pressure and 100°C, assuming water vapor behaves as a perfect gas. Participants explore the relationship between internal energy and enthalpy, particularly focusing on the change in the number of moles of gas during the phase transition from liquid to vapor.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the change in internal energy can be calculated using the equation $$\Delta U = \Delta H - \Delta n_{g}RT$$ and proposes that $$\Delta n_{g}$$ should be zero since 1 mol of liquid water is converted to 1 mol of vapor.
  • Another participant argues that $$\Delta n_{g}$$ represents the difference in moles of gaseous water and liquid water, suggesting it should be 1, leading to confusion regarding the initial and final states of the system.
  • Several participants question the interpretation of $$\Delta n_{g}$$, with some asserting that it should reflect the change in moles from zero (initial vapor) to one (final vapor), while others maintain that it should be zero based on the stoichiometry of the reaction.
  • A later reply clarifies that the volume of liquid water is negligible compared to that of water vapor, suggesting that the pressure-volume work term should be considered in the calculation of internal energy.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the subscripts in the chemical equation and how they relate to the calculation of $$\Delta n_{g}$$.
  • One participant notes that the initial and final states must be carefully considered, emphasizing the importance of understanding the definitions of the variables involved.
  • Another participant points out that the initial number of moles of vapor is zero, while the final number is one, leading to a proposed $$\Delta n_{g}$$ of 1.
  • There is a correction regarding the initial equation presented in the original post, with a participant indicating that it should include a minus sign to accurately reflect the relationship between enthalpy and internal energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the value of $$\Delta n_{g}$$, with multiple competing interpretations of its meaning and implications for the calculation of internal energy. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight that the definitions of the variables and the assumptions made in the calculations may lead to different interpretations of the results. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on the definitions of states and changes in moles during phase transitions.

NoahCygnus
Messages
96
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


If water vapor is assumed to be a perfect gas, molar enthalpy change for vaporization of 1 mol of water at 1 bar and 100 C is 41 kJ/mol . Calculate the internal energy, when 1 mol of water is vaporized at 1 bar pressure and 100 C.

Homework Equations


$$\Delta U = \Delta H = \Delta n_{g}RT$$

The Attempt at a Solution


The chemical equation is;
$$H_{2}O_{l} \longrightarrow H_{2}O_{g}$$
Then change in internal energy is related to change in enthalpy by;
$$\Delta U = \Delta H - \Delta n_{g}RT$$
Putting in the values;
$$\Delta U = 41 - (0)RT = 41 kJ/mol$$

However in the book they have given, $$\Delta n_{g} = 1$$. If the number of moles of water in liquid and gaseous phase are same , why isn't $$\Delta n_{g} = 0$$. ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what "Δ" means/indicates?
 
Bystander said:
Do you know what "Δ" means/indicates?
Change in something. ##\Delta n_{g}## represents in this situation the difference of moles of gaseous water and liquid water, it should be zero. But in the book for some reason , it is 1.
 
NoahCygnus said:
difference of moles of gaseous water and liquid water, it should be zero[insert] between initial/starting condition(s) and final condition(s) [/insert]. But in the book for some reason , it is 1.
Should it? Is it? What is the starting number?
 
Bystander said:
Should it? Is it? What is the starting number?
In the chemical equation ##1H_{2}O_{l} \longrightarrow 1H_{2}O_{g}##, 1 mol of water in liquid state is changing into 1 mol vapor so by that reasoning I came to the conclusion ##\Delta n_{g}## should be 0. Now I am truly lost... I checked a similar question, but there liquid water is being converted into ice and change in moles is ##\Delta n_{g} = 0##. What is going on here.
 
What is the initial number of moles of gas/vapor? What is the final number?
 
You are mistaking "change in number of moles of the substance" with "change in amount of the gas". In your equation number of moles stays the same, what about amount of gas?
 
Bystander said:
What is the initial number of moles of gas/vapor? What is the final number?
Initially, there are zero number of moles of the vapor and the final number is 1. I thought ##\Delta n_{g}## gives a change in the number of moles of products and reactants.
 
Borek said:
You are mistaking "change in number of moles of the substance" with "change in amount of the gas". In your equation number of moles stays the same, what about amount of gas?
##\Delta n_{g} = n_{products} - n_{reactants}## , the change relates products and reactants, it says ##\Delta n_{g}## is the difference between the moles of the right side of the chemical equation and the left side, so how am I making a mistake?
 
  • #10
How much gas on the reactants side? How much gas on the products side?
 
  • #11
Borek said:
How much gas on the reactants side? How much gas on the products side?
0 moles on the reactants side, 1 mole on the product side.
 
  • #12
What do the SUBSCRIPTS say?
 
  • #13
Bystander said:
What do the SUBSCRIPTS say?
It talks about the difference in the number of moles of gas between the products and reactants. As in the productside there are 0 moles of water vapour and on the right hand side there is 1 mole , ##\Delta n_{g} = 1##, so I was confused I thought ##\Delta n_{g} ## related to any state of matter on the reactants and products side.
 
  • #14
It is supposed to be the volume of one mole of water vapor minus the volume of one mole of liquid water (times the pressure). In your equation, the volume of one mole of liquid water is neglected compared to that of one mole of water vapor. So, from the ideal gas law, the pressure times the volume difference is ##PV_g=RT##, where Vg is the volume of one mole of vapor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #15
Left side:initial state in whatever state of aggregation::right side:final state in whatever state of aggregation.
NoahCygnus said:
In the chemical equation 1H2Ol⟶1H2Og1H2Ol⟶1H2Og1H_{2}O_{l} \longrightarrow 1H_{2}O_{g}, 1 mol of water in liquid state is changing into 1 mol vapor
You have got to pay attention to the subscripts. ng = 0 in the initial state; ng = 1 in the final state.
 
  • #16
NoahCygnus said:
It talks about the difference in the number of moles of gas between the products and reactants. As in the productside there are 0 moles of water vapour and on the right hand side there is 1 mole , ##\Delta n_{g} = -1##, so I was confused I thought ##\Delta n_{g} ## related to any state of matter on the reactants and products side.
Bystander said:
Left side:initial state in whatever state of aggregation::right side:final state in whatever state of aggregation.
You have got to pay attention to the subscripts. ng = 0 in the initial state; ng = 1 in the final state.
Bystander said:
Left side:initial state in whatever state of aggregation::right side:final state in whatever state of aggregation.
You have got to pay attention to the subscripts. ng = 0 in the initial state; ng = 1 in the final state.
If a hypothetical reaction is taking place where ##X_{s} + X_{s} \longrightarrow X_{2_{gas}}## then ##\Delta n## will be again 1.
How about this one , ## X_{s} + Y_{s} \longrightarrow XY_{l}## , in this case ##\Delta n## should be 0. Am I getting it right ?
 
  • #17
NoahCygnus said:
Am I getting it right ?
In a word, "No." Just got back from an "excursion."
 
  • #18
@NoahCygnus See @Chestermiller post 14. Also note that ## H=U+PV ##, so from that, given the ## \Delta H ##, enthalphy change that they supply you with, you can compute a ## \Delta U ##. The ## PV ## term, in the gaseous state, as was pointed out in post 14, is computed as ## PV=nRT ## for an ideal gas. The temperature for this equation is in degrees Kelvin. Meanwhile, you should have the value of the universal gas constant constant memorized. ## R=1.987 ## cal/(mole degree K) . I'll let you convert it to joules. ## \\ ## Note: In the liquid state, the ## PV ## term is minimal, since the volume is minimal in the liquid state, and the contribution for the liquid to the ## PV ## term in this computation can normally be ignored. ## \\ ## Since your background is somewhat limited according to your profile, I will write out the process in a little more detail: ## H_{gas}=U_{gas}+(PV)_{gas} ##, and ## H_{liquid}=U_{liquid}+(PV)_{liquid} ##. Meanwhile enthalpy change ## \Delta H=H_{gas}-H_{liquid} ##. To compute the change in internal energy ## \Delta U=U_{gas}-U_{liquid} ##, it is simply a little algebra. ## \\ ## (And it should be noted, the first equation that you wrote in the OP, that ## \Delta H=\Delta U ##, is incorrect).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NoahCygnus
  • #20
NoahCygnus said:
If a hypothetical reaction is taking place where ##X_{s} + X_{s} \longrightarrow X_{2_{gas}}## then ##\Delta n## will be again 1.
How about this one , ## X_{s} + Y_{s} \longrightarrow XY_{l}## , in this case ##\Delta n## should be 0. Am I getting it right ?

Beware: do you mean ##\Delta n## or ##\Delta n_g##? (Your answers are correct if the latter).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K