Calculation of the moment of inertia

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia quantifies how difficult it is to change an object's angular motion about a specific axis, factoring in both the total mass and the distribution of that mass relative to the axis. It is influenced by the distance of each mass element from the axis, meaning that mass further from the axis contributes more to the moment of inertia. This concept connects to other fields, such as statistics and structural engineering, where similar mathematical principles apply. Notably, while the second moment of area is solely dependent on geometry, the mass moment of inertia also requires consideration of the object's actual mass. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate calculations in physics and engineering.
Dranzer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I was wondering why we can not always assume the mass of a body to be concentrated at the Center of Mass and then multiplying the total mass by the square of the distance from center of mass to the axis,while calculating the moment of inertia of a body.(I found this question in University Physics)

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dranzer:

The moment of inertia of an object about a given axis describes how difficult it is to change its angular motion about that axis. Therefore, it encompasses not just how much mass the object has overall, but how far each bit of mass is from the axis. The further out the object's mass is, the more rotational inertia the object has, and the more torque (force* distance from axis of rotation) is required to change its rotation rate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia
 
Thank you very much.I didn't quite think of that.
 
It's interesting to note that the MI relates to the Standard Deviation of a statistical distribution and also to the strength of a beam. They're all 'second moments'.
Same maths crops up all over the place.
 
An interesting thing to add though, is that the second moment of area only depends one the geometry of the cross section, while the mass moment of inertia also depends on the actual mass.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top