Calculation of the Pontryagin index

  • Thread starter Thread starter S_klogW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Index
S_klogW
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
When I read A.Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, he asked me to do the calculation of his exercise IV.4.6: (A.Zee called these the Pontryagin Index)

Let g(x) be the element of a group G. The 1-form v = gdg† is known as the Cartan-Maurer form. Then tr v^N is trivially closed on an N-dimensional manifold since it is already an N-form. Consider Q = SN ∫tr vN with SN the N-dimensional sphere. Discuss the topological meaning of Q. These con- siderations will become important later when we discuss topology in field theory in chapter V.7. [Hint: Study the case N = 3 and G = SU(2).]

I found that the result for G=SU(2) and N=3 is -24π^2, is it correct? I also calculated for the case N=1 and G=U(1), and i found the result is -2πi. What's on Earth is the topological meaning of these results?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't vN the volume element? Sounds like you're calculating the group volume.
 
Just to clarify the notation: you have to calculate

v_i = g^\dagger \partial_{i}\,g

Q[g] = \frac{1}{c}\int_{S^N}d^N\Omega\,\epsilon^{i_1 i_2 \ldots i_N}\,\text{tr}(v_{i_1}\,v_{i_2}\ldots v_{i_N})

for various Lie groups G with a Lie group valued function

g \in G

I guess the main problem you have is to find the correct constant c which obviously depends on the group G.
 
OK, let's continue with U(1) on S1. Let's write

g(x) = e^{i\nu(x)}

with a function nu(x) respecting the S1 periodicity, i.e. with

\nu(x+2\pi) = \nu(x)+n\;\Rightarrow\;g(x+2\pi) = g(x)+n

Calculating v(x) we get

v_x = g^\dagger\,\partial_x\,g = i\,\partial_x\,\nu

For the integral we find

-i\int_0^{2\pi}dx \, v_x = \int_0^{2\pi}dx \, \partial_x\,\nu = \nu(2\pi) - \nu(0) = n

That means that the function nu(x) runs from 0 to n when x runs from 0 to 2π; so g runs around the U(1) circle n-times when x runs around the S1 circle once. That means that

Q[g] = n

is nothing else but the winding number of the map

g: S^1 \to U(1)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
8K
2
Replies
52
Views
12K
2
Replies
93
Views
14K
Replies
42
Views
10K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top