Calculus Based Textbook that isn't Halliday

AI Thread Summary
For self-teaching Physics 1 with a calculus-based approach, several textbook recommendations emerged. While Halliday is noted for its thoroughness, it may feel repetitive and slow for some learners. Alternatives like the five-volume Berkeley Physics series are suggested, particularly volumes authored by C. Kittel and E. Purcell, which are well-regarded for their clarity and depth. Other recommended series include the Manchester Physics Series and the MIT Physics Series. Additionally, it's important to enhance mathematical skills alongside physics understanding, with books like "Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences" by Reilly and "The Chemistry Maths Book" by Steiner being highlighted as useful resources. These texts aim to bridge the gap between mathematics and physics, catering to those with strong mathematical backgrounds looking to deepen their physics knowledge.
Vorde
Messages
786
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am looking for a good calculus-based textbook to self-teach Physics 1 from. I have Halliday but I find it slow-going and too tedious for me, not in depth but in repetition. I have already taken a Physics 1 class at my school, but my school's physics department is rather dreadful and so I'd say I know less than a quarter of what would be covered in a normal high school physics course (AP that is).

On the other hand, my mathematical skills are quite good for my age, having completed all single-variable calculus and basic multivariable. As a result (or maybe seperate), I find Halliday too slow and Feynman's lectures too conceptual (though brilliant in their own right).

So I was hoping that I could be pointed towards a nice Physics textbook, the key thing being that it is Calculus based to the greatest extent possible.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kleppner may be of use. Of course, the point of an intro class is to learn the physics so a book being too conceptual seems odd.
 
Last edited:
Take a look at the 5 volume Berkeley Physics series. They were used for honors freshman physics when I attended college, where the standard course for physics majors used Halliday and Resnick. It has been a long time, but I recall being pleased with vol. 1 (mechanics) which was authored by C. Kittel, who wrote classic texts on solid state physics. Vol. 2 (electricity and magnetism) is a widely acclaimed gem written by Nobel laureate E. Purcell. Thermal physics (vol. 4) by Reif is another standout--often referred to as "baby Reif" to differentiate it from his graduate level text. The series might be more to your tastes.
 
marcusl has it exactly.

Once you move on from Physics at the level of R & H the subject is offered in texts covering particular areas, often written by acknowledged experts in that field, as opposed to one gigantic text covering everything.

There are other good university physics series such as

The Manchester Physics Series
The MIT Physics Series

You should also be looking at the issue from another perspective - viz that of applied maths.
There are many good applied maths books that bridge the gap

Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences - Reilly
The Chemistry Maths book - Steiner

From what you have said, you will need to develop your maths skills along with your physics. Steiner is particularly good for taking you on to the next level.

go well
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
27
Views
19K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top