Calculus Beyond Integration: What's Next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alvin51015
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of mathematical processes that extend beyond integration, particularly focusing on whether there is an iterative operation analogous to how multiplication extends addition. While higher-order integrations exist, such as second-order integrals, the conversation suggests that no established operation has been conceived that functions similarly to exponentiation for integration. The idea of infinite iterations of integration raises questions about convergence and the potential for algebraically inexpressible results. Participants mention that while integration serves multiple purposes, including area calculation, the search for a higher abstraction remains largely unexplored. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the absence of a defined next step beyond integration, though transforms like the Fourier Transform are suggested as related concepts.
alvin51015
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
This question may sound simplistic but is there a mathematical process which lies directly beyond integration integration, or more specifically beyond finding the antiderivative? And by that I mean loosely what is the next step? I do apologize if this statement sounds vague to higher minds. But I have certainly been racking my brain over this for awhile, and perhaps someone enlightened to where I am going with this can offer some assistance. Much appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As you can have higher-order derivatives so you can have higher order integrations.
i.e. The second order integration is basically how you get the solution to ##y''=f(x)##

i.e. ##y=3x^2## ... will have indefinite integrals:

##\int y\;dx = x^3+c##

##\iint y\; dx\; dx = \frac{1}{4}x^4 + cx + d##

However, it is possible to get carried away with this sort of thing.
The integration does a bit more than finding the anti-derivative ... i.e. finding areas.
 
Yessir. I see your point. But what happens if I do infinite iterations of integrating starting with. Simple polynomial? I doubt if the end result would converge to anything algebraically inexpressible. But is there some higher and more abstract way to express what is going here?
 
There is no reason that the result, for an arbitrary integrand, would converge to anything in particular.
The short answer to your question is "no".

There are always more abstract ways to express things though.
 
I believe what OP is asking is if there's an iterative "operation" for integration, much as there is an iterative operation for addition in multiplication, or an iterative operation for multiplication in exponentiation. I'm no mathematician myself, but I believe that no such operation has been conceived, as we have no use of it.

That said, though, you might want to look into transforms, like the Fourier Transform. While not what you're looking for, it's a good "next step", in my opinion.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top