Call for ban on "moment ago" on posts.

  • Thread starter Thread starter houlahound
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the term "moment ago" used in posts, with participants debating its precision and relevance in a physics context. While some argue that "moment" lacks a defined duration, others clarify that it historically refers to about one and a half minutes. The conversation touches on the implications of using vague terminology in scientific discussions, with references to Planck units and their speculative nature. Ultimately, the thread concludes with an acknowledgment of the term's legitimacy based on its historical context in celestial mechanics. The participants agree to move past the issue, recognizing the educational value of the discussion.
houlahound
Messages
907
Reaction score
223
It's sloppy terminology for a physics forum - I mean how long is a moment?

First world problem I know, but still.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
houlahound said:
I mean how long is a moment?
< minute.
 
Reference, citation?
 
Presumably you're asking me for a citation when you can do the measurement for yourself? Just pull the trigger on "post," and watch.
 
Yeah but is < minute a technically correct unit of time moment.
 
Posts or changes less than one minute old are shown as "a moment ago".

houlahound said:
Yeah but is < minute a technically correct unit of time moment.

Yes.
Edit: Sorry, I misunderstood what you were asking. I don't think the term 'moment' is defined as some exact amount. But does it even matter?
 
Please don't! If I put this thought to an end we will read figures in Planck units ...
 
Drakkith said:
But does it even matter?

Good question, i will have to think about it for a moment.
 
fresh_42 said:
Please don't! If I put this thought to an end we will read figures in Planck units ...

Plank units are too speculative.
 
  • #10
A moment was originally a precisely defined amount of time; one fortieth of a solar hour, which was in turn a twelfth of the time between sunrise and sunset (and varied with the time of year). On average a moment was therefore about one and a half minutes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_(time)
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd, jackwhirl, houlahound and 1 other person
  • #11
houlahound said:
Plank units are too speculative.
They are as speculative as 2+2=4. They are a mathematical tool.

I don't see the problem with "a moment ago". Xenforo does that by default.
 
  • #12
mfb said:
They are as speculative as 2+2=4. They are a mathematical tool.

I don't see the problem with "a moment ago". Xenforo does that by default.
Hardly physics...can you show me a 2 in the real world?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Jonathan Scott said:
A moment was originally a precisely defined amount of time; one fortieth of a solar hour, which was in turn a twelfth of the time between sunrise and sunset (and varied with the time of year). On average a moment was therefore about one and a half minutes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_(time)
Then Xenforo software needs an upgrade.

Thanks for the link, interesting.
 
  • #14
houlahound said:
Then Xenforo software needs an upgrade.
Why? Just because you don't like a phrase used there?

You are inventing a problem that does not exist.
houlahound said:
Hardly physics...can you show me a 2 in the real world?
Both the Planck units and 2 are mathematical concepts with applications in physics.
 
  • #15
OK I have gotten past this issue, thanks for sticking with.

On an educational note I have learned a moment in time is a legitimate scientific quantity based on celestial mechanics via the solar hour.
 
  • #16
houlahound said:
OK I have gotten past this issue, thanks for sticking with.

On an educational note I have learned a moment in time is a legitimate scientific quantity based on celestial mechanics via the solar hour.
With that eureka "moment" I am closing this silly thread.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and fresh_42
Back
Top