Can a Bounded Random Variable Be Found for Almost Equal Random Variables?

student12s
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to solve the following question: Let X be a random variable s.t. Pr[|X|<+\infty]=1. Then for every epsilon>0 there exists a bounded random variable Y such that P[X\neq Y]<epsilon.

The ideia here would be to find a set of epsilon measure so Y would be different than X in that set. However, it is not clear even that such a measurable set exists...

Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To show there is some interval (-a, a) such that \int_{-a}^a f(x) dx &gt; 1-\epsilon, apply the definition of an improper integral to \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x) dx = 1. Have Y=X over (-a,a).
 
For a large positive number \lambda, define Y = X on the set \{|X| \le \lambda\} and Y=0 on the remaining part of the sample space. Now all you have to do is choose \lambda large enough to get the conclusion you want.
 
It would remain to show that such $\lambda$ exists. We can definte the sets A_n=\{\omega\in \Omega: |X(\omega)|<n\}. Since A_n is measurable, as X is a random variable, and A_n \uparrow \{\omega: |X|<+\infty}, we have that \lim P(A_n) = P(\{\omega: |X|<+\infty}. Therefore, for all \epsilon, there is $m$ large enough so that P(A_n)>1-\epsilon. Then we can define Y=X in A_m and Y=0 otherwise.

Thanks!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top