Can a Capacitor Be Used to Charge a Coil in a Magnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
A coil in a magnetic field generates a sinusoidal emf output, which can indeed charge a capacitor when part of a parallel LC circuit. The discussion highlights that capacitors store energy in electric fields, while inductors are necessary for energy storage in magnetic fields. Implementing a rectifier diode can convert the AC voltage to unidirectional current, making it suitable for various applications. The conversation centers around the feasibility of using these components together in a lab setting. Overall, the integration of capacitors, inductors, and rectifiers in such circuits is viable and can be explored further.
Queequeg
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
A coil in a magnetic field produces a sinusoidal emf output, so why can't you just attach a capacitor to it to charge it? Is it simply because capacitors store energy in electric fields, so you would need an inductor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Queequeg said:
A coil in a magnetic field produces a sinusoidal emf output, so why can't you just attach a capacitor to it to charge it? Is it simply because capacitors store energy in electric fields, so you would need an inductor?

A parallel LC circuit immersed in a changing B-field will indeed develop an AC voltage across the capacitor. Why would you think it would not?
 
berkeman said:
A parallel LC circuit immersed in a changing B-field will indeed develop an AC voltage across the capacitor. Why would you think it would not?

Hmm that would work and got me thinking, so besides an LC circuit could one also implement a rectifier diode for unidirectional current instead of the sinusoidal wave?
 
Queequeg said:
Hmm that would work and got me thinking, so besides an LC circuit could one also implement a rectifier diode for unidirectional current instead of the sinusoidal wave?

Of course. What is the application?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
It was just a discussion question for a lab, thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top