Can a Chaotic Three-Body System Save a Planet from Destruction?

AI Thread Summary
A science fiction author seeks advice on creating a plausible scenario where a planet is saved from destruction by one of its twin suns entering a supergiant phase or going supernova. Suggestions include the formation of a plasma bridge, though its occurrence may require close proximity between celestial bodies. The discussion emphasizes that while a star's evolution is inevitable, its brightness and other characteristics can still impact the planet's habitability. Additionally, the chaotic nature of a three-body system complicates planetary orbits, suggesting that a small perturbation, like an asteroid collision, could alter the planet's trajectory and potentially save it. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding astronomical scales and dynamics in crafting a believable narrative.
Athanasius
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I am writing a science fiction book, and have had a lot of fun writing it so far. However, I am facing a technical astronomical problem right now that I would appreciate some advice concerning:

I am looking for a plausible scenario in which one of a pair of "fraternal" twin suns is about to destroy a planet containing intelligent life. However, an astronomical event occurs which prevents this. I was thinking of the danger to the planet coming from one of it's twin suns entering the supergiant phase, or being about to go supernova, but this being prevented by the formation of a plasma bridge. Is very close proximity the only event which could trigger the formation of a bridge like that? Also, while I would prefer for the planet to be in the habitable zone of the same solar system as the twin stars if that were possible, it could be in a neighboring solar system instead. Any guidelines or advice that any of you could share with me would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your options are pretty slim. For one thing, the evolution of a star is a natural occurrence that can't be stopped. Even if you halt this "catastrophe", the star is still undergoing changes that could severely impact the planet. For example, it could be growing bright or dimmer, redder or bluer, puffing out its outer layers, etc.
 
Thanks for your reply Drakkith. I am digging in more and will do a good deal more reading before asking any more questions regarding this.
 
Last edited:
I'd recommend trying to get a grasp of the scale of space. I mean, distances between objects are utterly unimaginable for how big the objects are. The Sun is about 1.4 million kilometers across (a little under 5 light-seconds) yet the distance between it and the nearest star, Proxima Centauri, is more than 3 light-years.

That's 1,400,000 km for the diameter of the Sun, and 30,000,000,000,000 km for the distance between it and the nearest star. That's 7 orders of magnitude difference (7 million times difference), meaning it would take about 7 million Suns placed end to end to reach Proxima Centauri.

And 3 light-years is a Sunday stroll compared to the distances across galaxies and between galaxies...
 
A three body problem can be chaotic. With two stars, the orbit of a planet is very difficult to predict. Perhaps the orbit of the planet comes too close to one of the stars and all life on the planet will be destroyed. This could be prevented by a collision with an asteroid, which sets the planet into another chaotic orbit. The asteroid doesn't have to be cataclysmically large-- remember that in a chaotic system, a small perturbation (butterfly's wings) can grow to a large change in the future. The residents of the planet could possibly engineer the asteroid to collide with the planet.
 
I'm currently writing a novel in which my main character was a victim of experimentation (cliche, I know) but has no memory of it. In the experimentation, technology was implanted in the character's body, allowing an AI algorithm to run off of the character and fuse it's psychological aspects with an actual human's. I'm not super knowledgeable in science such as this, and I'm sure doing this would be incredibly hard, if not impossible, to do. So for the sake of keeping the peace, let's just...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top