Can a Claw Design Hold a Spinning Ball Against Centripetal Force?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the engineering challenge of designing a claw mechanism for a robot that launches a foam basketball using a centripetal arm. The arm requires significant torque and force to hold the ball against centripetal force while ensuring a quick release. Suggestions include using a cup design to hold the ball in place during rotation and employing a claw with stiff fingers to prevent radial movement while allowing tangential release. Concerns about the excessive force required from servos indicate that a more efficient design could reduce the load on the servos. Overall, the design must balance holding the ball securely while enabling a rapid and safe release.
physicsofme
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys and gals, I have a robotics related engineering problem I need help with.

So, for our robot we are building, it has a centripetal arm that launches a foam basketball. The arm is 2 foot in diameter rotating from the center with 3 pounds on each side (including projectile and counterweight). It is also shooting up to 60 feet away and 6 foot high. So that comes out to needing 468 RPM with 19 ft/sec acceleration, 15 N force, a required torque of 684 oz-in with 10 spin up rotations that releases after 2.5 seconds.

So basically the centripetal force is 232.449 N and the centripetal acceleration is 732.089 M/s^2.

So for our claw design, it's three different welded chain links to form fit the ball with a urethane fingertip to add friction between the urethane ball. But how can we calculate the required torque of the three servos (one on each chain piece) that's needed to hold the ball in place against the centripetal force? It also needs to be able to release fast enough. Is the centripetal force too much for any servo? or what? We're very confused. Please help :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
looks like centrifugal force to me - the servo is not seeing an inertial reference frame - by your calcs you need the servos to be able to hold on to 75kgs ... which seems a bit excessive to me. Mind you, I've never had to throw a 3lb ball 60ft.
 
Last edited:
Aside: have you considered putting the ball in a cup with the opening perpendicular to the arm so the acceleration holds the ball in place - releasing the ball involves stopping the arm abruptly ... say your servo pushes a barrier of some sort in the way, at the correct angle, as the arm comes around on the tenth turn? (You'll probably want the same action to disconnect the motor driving the arm too.) This way the servo does not have to be strong enough to hold the ball.

Of course this assumes that throwing the ball is all the robot has to do.
If you must have a hand, then you only need one servo-finger... and only that one needs to form-fit the ball.
 
Well it does have to have a hand to receive the ball from another hand, and we went over the abrupt release but we fear damaging our robot, which is a high probability with such speeds. The ball is actually 11.2 ounces and the rest of the arm is a little more than 2 pounds if that helps. And that's just one side of the arm, the other side has the same counterweight as the first side with the ball.

So also, is there a way to create a claw piece that would be able to act as a normal force for the ball while spinning because the centripetal force would also push it towards the outside so if it were balanced correctly, it would still remain towards the outside? Then would it still need 75 kg force to open up?
 
So also, is there a way to create a claw piece that would be able to act as a normal force for the ball while spinning
Yes. Hard to describe ... consider: on release, the ball wants to fly perpendicular to the arm.

Make two stiff fingers in a kind of claw so they curl over the ball stopping it from moving radially. You'll need to experiment a bit so the ball will still slip out tangentially if it is not restrained. Then you just need a servo thumb to hold the ball in place. Should require almost nothing to hold it in place.

If you were sitting on the hand holding the ball, it would feel like you were holding a grown man against gravity. I suspect this is the reason machines for throwing balls are usually a flywheel and a hopper.

note: centripetal force pulls everything towards the center.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top