Can a Diffraction Pattern be Solved Without Complete Information?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving a single slit diffraction pattern, where the first minimum is given, but crucial information such as the distance from the slit to the wall is missing. Participants express uncertainty about solving the problem without this data, suggesting that it may be impossible to find a solution as presented. They recommend checking with others for additional insights and encourage moving on to other problems in the meantime. The consensus is that the problem might need clarification from the professor. Overall, the lack of complete information hinders the ability to solve the diffraction pattern question effectively.
David Truong
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A single slit illuminated by light of wavelength λ = 610 nm produces a diffraction pattern with its first minimum at 3.5 mm from the central maximum. (a) Find the slit width, and (b) For the same slit, what wavelength of light would produce a first minimum at θ = 4.0 degrees.

Homework Equations



D = slit width
m = minima order
L = distance from the slit to the wall

D sin θ = m λ
tan θ = sin θ = θ (small angle approximation)

The Attempt at a Solution



λ = 610 nm or 6.1 x 10^-7 m
m = 1 (first order minima)
x = 3.5 mm (which is the distance from the central maximum to the first minimum)

tan θ = x / L

D = m λ / sin θ

I would be able to solve this question if I was given either the distance from the slit to the wall (L) or the angle (θ), however, I am not given any of this, and as such, I am unsure how to proceed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not possible to solve the problem with the information written above.
You should complain to the person who set the problem - make sure you have read all the information given as sometimes a vital bit is someplace else. Check with other people doing the same problem - it helps to have others also complaining.
 
Hello David,

Please update us if the professor says it was right and then shows you how to do it. I've been thinking about this question for a bit but have not come up with a solution for you. I agree with Simon, I do not believe it can be solved as presented. But I will think about it more if I have time later this week. Please keep us updated. In the mean time don't get too caught up on it. Move on to other problems. :D

Best Regards,

Caleb P.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top