Can a dot product be negative in case of length?

AI Thread Summary
The dot product of two vectors can indeed be negative, even though the lengths of the vectors are always non-negative. In the case of vectors A and B with an angle of 170° between them, the dot product will yield a negative value due to the negative cosine of that angle. This negative result indicates that the projection of one vector onto the other is in the opposite direction. The discussion emphasizes that while vector lengths are non-negative, the directionality of vectors allows for a negative dot product. Understanding this concept is crucial in vector analysis.
EmSeeSquared
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Let's say A and B are 2 vectors with length in cm and the angle between them is 170°.

Obviously, the dot product of A and B will give cm2 as unit but since the value of cos(170) is negative, will the dot product be negative (something)cm2?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, the dot product will be negative. The geometric implication is that when A is projected onto B, the projection will be in the opposite direction to B (and vice versa).

The length merely represents the magnitude of a vector, and not its direction. A length is always non-negative, but that doesn't stop the dot product of two vectors from being negative.
 
Last edited:
Curious3141 said:
Yes, the dot product will be negative. The geometric implication is that when A is projected onto B, the projection will be in the opposite direction to B (and vice versa).

The length merely represents the magnitude of a vector, and not its direction. A length is always non-negative, but that doesn't stop the dot product of two vectors from being negative.

Aha! Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top