Can a Group of Order 20 with Elements of Order 4 Be Cyclic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeldotB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic Group
DeldotB
Messages
117
Reaction score
8
Hello all!

If I have a group of order 20 that has three elements of order 4, can this group be cyclic? What if it has two elements? I am new to abstract algebra, so please keep that in mind!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it's cyclic then it has a generator element g such that ##g^{20}=1## and ##1,g,g^2,...,g^{19}## are all different.

Let the three elements of order 4 be a, b and c.

What can we deduce about what powers of g each of those elements could be?
 
Do the powers need to divide 20?
 
That's a sufficient, but not a necessary condition.

Think about the* cyclic group of order 20: {1,##g,g^2,...,g^{19}##}. Express the fourth power of each of its elements as ##g^m## where ##m<20##.

*Note the use of 'the' rather than 'a'. All cyclic groups of order 'n' are isomorphic.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top