Can a Longitudinal Oscillator Be Seen as a Standing Wave?

AI Thread Summary
A longitudinal oscillator, such as a mass on a string, cannot be directly observed as a standing wave due to its lack of connectivity necessary for energy propagation. While a standing wave consists of counter-propagating waves, a single oscillator only has a restoring force without the ability to communicate energy effectively. Continuous excitation by higher harmonics can lead to varying amplitude responses compared to excitation at natural frequencies, with specific frequencies resonating more powerfully. Instruments like flutes and guitars demonstrate different responses to harmonics based on their design and the power spectrum of the input. Resonance can have devastating effects, as illustrated by the Tacoma Narrows bridge collapse, which occurred due to resonance at frequencies not aligned with the fundamental frequency.
pinsky
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

I was thinking is it possible to observe a simple longitudinal oscilator (lets say a mass on a string) as a standing wave?

Thinking maybe as wave which has a front 4 times than the size of the string. So when we excite the string, we are actually emmiting a wave.


One more thing relatied to oscillations and resonannce. How does an object react when excited by continuous higher harmonics?

Is the gain in the amplitude of oscillation different that of when a body is excited by its natural frequency?

Can higher harmonic also have devastating effects as does excitation by a resonance frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A single oscillator isn't really a wave. It only has one of the two key elements-- a restoring force. The other key element is connectivity-- the work done by the restoring force, instead of being stored in a local potential, has to be communicated to the neighboring environment. That connectivity, or ability to communicate energy, is the key aspect of propagation. So even though a standing wave doesn't propagate, it can be thought of as counter-propagating waves whose propagation effectively cancels, not the absence of the ability to propagate.

Excitation by continuous harmonics is typical. For example, when you blow into a flute, your breath is creating an input over a wide frequency band, but the flute picks out the resonance frequency and all its harmonics. However, some frequencies have more power in the original signal, and some resonate better. Often the fundamental is maximized for both those reasons, but a lot of the design of the instrument goes into the response to the various overtones. So flutes sound different from guitars, both because they are excited by a different type of "power spectrum", and because they respond differently to that excitation. So you are right-- there is an issue of gain that depends on frequency.

As for devastating effects, some time look at the video of the Tacoma Narrows bridge. It was destroyed by a resonance that does not look like the fundamental frequency of the bridge, there appear to be several nodes.
 
Ken G is right. However, you can think of an oscillator as tracing out the shape of a wave as it oscillates. Analogous to this is the situation of electrical charges which may oscillate, causing the medium they make up to emit an electromagnetic wave.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top