Can a Matrix be Recovered from Eigenvalues Alone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cylab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Recover
Cylab
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hello

Is it possible to recover Matrix from eigenvalue alone?
that is, A = PDP^-1,,,
once only D (eigenvalues) is known,, without knowing eigenvectors,
is it possible to recover A?

Thanks

P.S. I will appreciate if you can provide me with some algorithms about recovering original matrix..:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you cannot "recover" the matrix from the eigenvalues alone for the simple reason that there exist an infinite number of matrics having the same eigenvalues.

If D is a given diagonal matrix, and P is any invertible matrix, then A= P^{-1}DP is a matrix having the numbers on D's diagonal as eigenvalues. Different P matrices will, in general, give different matrices having the same eigenvalues.
 
It should be obvious that you can't do this just be counting the number of terms involved.

An n x n matrix has n2 terms which are all indepdent of each other. You can't re-create n2 different numbers from just n eigenvalues, unless n = 1.
 
Thanks a lot for your attention. They are really helpful.
How about opposite, that is,
Is it possible to recover Matrix from eigenspace alone (without knowing eigenvalues)?
Or does each erigenvector reveal some information?

Thanks again.
 
Again, no. for example, the matrices
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}2 & 0 \\ 0 & 3\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}6 & 0 \\ 0 & -1\end{bmatrix}
and, generally,
\begin{bmatrix}X & 0 \\ 0 & Y\end{bmatrix}
for any x and y, all have i and j as eigenvectors but are different matrices with, of course, different eigenvalues.


To point out what should be obvious, two different matrices can have exactly the same eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors. In that case, they would be similar matrices.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top