Can a membrane create standing waves in the shape of a cube or cone?

AI Thread Summary
Creating computer simulations of membranes exhibiting standing waves in the shape of a cube or cone is theoretically possible, similar to string simulations. Finite element analysis software like COMSOL Multiphysics can be used to model these scenarios, although specific setup instructions may be required. The discussion highlights the feasibility of simulating complex geometries in wave mechanics. Further exploration and guidance on using such software for these simulations could enhance understanding. Overall, the potential for visualizing standing waves in unconventional shapes is acknowledged.
magi
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Can you do a computer simulation of a membrane with a standing wave(s)/node(s) with a shape of a cube or cone?
It is possible on a string so why not on a membrane.
Can you do a computer simulation of a spherical membrane with a standing wave(s)/node(s) with a shape of a cube or cone?

Regards Magi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top