Can a Moon Have Its Own Moon? Exploring Orbital Possibilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter mee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
AI Thread Summary
It is theoretically possible for a moon to have its own moon, but ordinary moon formation processes make this unlikely. The gravitational influence, or Hill Sphere, of moons is small, which limits the chances of stable orbits for secondary moons. Currently, there are no known moons of moons in our solar system, although future discoveries in exosolar systems may reveal such phenomena. Some Kuiper Belt Objects have multiple moons, leading to discussions about whether they could be considered moons of moons. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, the stability of such orbits poses significant challenges.
mee
Messages
213
Reaction score
1
Does anybody know if it is even possible for a planetary moon to have a moon of its own orbiting it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mee said:
Does anybody know if it is even possible for a planetary moon to have a moon of its own orbiting it?

I suppose it's possible, but I am not 100% knowing of such a moon.

Ordinary moon formation processes prevent this. However, I think it is possible for a rogue asteriod to orbit the moon. However, a rogue asteriod is far more likely to orbit the Earth than to orbit its moon. The larger the area of gravitational influence, the more likely it is to have a moon. An orbit that is at odds with a moon will eventually impact it.
 
To expand upon what kmarinas said, the area of gravitational influence, aka the Hill Sphere is small for moons. Moons tend to migrate after their creation. For example, Earth's Moon was originally much closer. This would have virtually eliminated any chance the Moon had for having moons of its own. Billions of years later, after arriving in its current orbit, the Moon's Hill sphere has a lot more room in it for moons, but there's no mechanism remaining for delivering a moon to the Moon. The capture method won't work.

There are no moons of moons in our solar system. However, it wouldn't surprise me if some day they were discovered in exosolar systems.
 
Recently several KBOs (Keuper Belt Objects, of which Pluto is the best known) have been found with multiple moons. Thus Pluto, in addition to Charon, has two other companions that orbit each other and around Pluto. [You could twist definitions a little and say that each of those is a a moon of a moon.]
I would not be surprised for a future discovery in the Kuiper Belt to properly meet the moon of a moon definition, once we can agree what a planet is! Like Tony, I am sure there are some out there somewhere, but the stability of the orbits is probably not great. One imagines them forming as the result of collisions.
 
The problem with moons of moons relates to the Roche lobe. Technically, the Earth is a moon of the sun, and our moon is a moon of a moon [earth]. This illustrates the distance and mass scales necessary to permit stable orbits of such entities.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top