Can a Particle in a Bounded System Have Momentum in One Direction?

Syrus
Messages
213
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a particle in a one-dimensional box whose (time-independent) state is given by
e^ikx. Of course, this corresponds to the particle moving with a momentum of magnitude hk in the positive (let's call it x) direction.

I know momentum in the quantum sense cannot be regarded as momentum in the classical sense. I am struggling to conceive how a particle in such a bounded system can always have momentum in one direction- how can it renew itself when it reaches the right boundary? I am thinking it has something to do with (complex) traveling waves, but i can't put my finger on it. I also looked in a few books on quantum mechanics and was able to find the following lines, which I believe applies to my inquiry somehow:

"In a nutshell: the formal problem with applying the classical definition of momentum to an ensemble of microscopic particles arises because it is impossible to measure the position of such particles without altering their state. This vicissitude is inevitable, because prior to measurement, the particles do not have a position or a momentum."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is the picture you have in your head of a little ball bouncing back and forth between the walls isn't really a good one when it comes to quantum mechanics. You're trying to understand quantum mechanics in terms of classical concepts but it should be the other way around. Quantum mechanics is the more general theory.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top