Can a Photo Effect Us Like a Live Person?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kumar5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photo
AI Thread Summary
Photos can evoke psychological and emotional responses similar to those elicited by live interactions, primarily through their color and shape. While a photo lacks the emitted, transmitted, or reflected spectrum of a live person, it can still stimulate the viewer's brain through recognition and emotional association. The discussion acknowledges that black and white photos can also have an impact, despite the absence of color. Additionally, the effects of photos may be influenced by factors like distance and the absorption of wavelengths through the skin. Overall, while the interaction with a photo is different from that with a live person, it can still produce significant psychological effects.
kumar5
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello,


We may interact with any live person by its emitted, transmited, reflected spectrum or otherwise and get effects?

We can't think about emission and transmission of emited radiations in consideration to this topic subject. So we now left about reflected spectrum--shape. colours etc.

So;

Can a photo of somewhat true colour and spectrum effect us alike a live person?

We may get some psychlogical emotional effects but these are also "getting effect" by looking and recognizing a photo. We also interact and get effects by interacting with "Black & White" photo.

Similarily, we can also think about, origional/live structures for their effects by reflection spectrum.

So pls guide me accordingly.

Best wishes.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We may interact with any live person by its emitted, transmited, reflected spectrum or otherwise and get effects?
Only in the sense that our eyes are stimulated by the photons emanating from a person, or animal, or object. Then that information is passed to the brain - and the brain thinks about it (neurochemical reaction).

If a person is nearby, but not seen (not observed) then there is no discernible effect. Of course, this ignores thermal, chemical and acoustical effects.
 
Usually, people looking at photo are close enough. Yes, photo effect ignores thermal, chemical and acoustical effects but still how much spectral lines from photo or from any substance as distance can effect? We may also get some effects by absorption across the skin of wavlenght not reflected.

Somewhere, colour/sunrays/photo therapies are indicated. It is also indicated that low stimuli can encourage physiolo0gical activities whereas strong one can discourage these.
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
17K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top