Can a Rubber Band Replace a Steel Spring in Measuring Weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OVB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
A rubber band cannot effectively replace a steel spring in a scale for measuring weight because it does not provide a linear relationship between deflection and weight, which is essential for accurate measurements according to Hooke's law. Steel springs can also be overloaded into the inelastic region, leading to permanent deformation, while rubber bands exhibit non-linear behavior. For suspension bridges, the supporting wires should be elastic to allow them to return to their original position after load removal, ensuring structural integrity. The spring constant of a material is a property that remains independent of gravity, while weight is determined by gravitational force. Understanding these principles is crucial for designing effective measurement systems and structures.
OVB
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I think I am getting some concepts confused, so i need help clarifying the answers to the following questions:

1. can you use a rubber band instead of a steel spring in a scale to measure weight?
- I said no, because it would break
2. Should the wires supporting a suspension bridge be elastic or inelastic?
- I said elastic so that it can return to its original position, but I don't know how to expand on this...

3. How is a steel wire "very elastic" if it does not stretch much with large forces?
- I am not sure at all about this oneAnd k is independent of gravity right? (i.e., if you have a force and a displacement on earth, would those be in the same proportion on the moon? I'm thinking F/x = k equals a direct proportion but I might be breaking smoe rules).

I spent a good hour before and that is the progress I have made.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
does anyone know?
 
I explained rather well what I knew and what I didn't. Am I being ignored for something I left out or does no one know?
 
1. can you use a rubber band instead of a steel spring in a scale to measure weight?
- I said no, because it would break

Well, no is the right answer, but the reasoning is not correct.

1. In order to measure weight, the deflection must be linearly proportional to the weight - that is the point of Hooke's law. Only this way can one obtain a uniformly graduated scale. Steel spring could also be overloaded into the inelastic region, in which case it would be permanently deformed.

A rubber band is non-linear. The cross-section changes as it stretches. One might try and experiment with a suitable rubber band. Load it up with gram weights e.g. 1g, 2g, 3g, . . . and see if the deflection is a constant multiple of the mass.

The spring constant is a property of the metal and independent of gravity. The weight of something is a measure of the gravitational force on the mass - W = mg.

2. If a metal is stressed into the inelastic range, there will be permanent deformation. Structures are designed such the materials in the components operate well below the yield strength, i.e. well within the elastic range. When a structure is loaded then unloaded, as happens when a vehicle crosses a bridge, then the structure must return to its original unloaded form. Bridges are designed to deflect under load, but not by much. Many (or most) structures tend to be very stiff - i.e. resist displacement.

3. If a metal is highly loaded, and still does not stretch (which I take to mean 'permanently deform'), then it has a 'large elastic' range.

When metals are deformed, they are worked beyond the elastic range (yield strength) and they are plastically deformed.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top