Can a Satellite's Orbit Around Earth Be Quantized Like a Hydrogen Atom?

December
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Macroscopic quantum model

Hi!
I'm supposed to calculate the quantum number of a macroscopic system (The Earth and a satellite).

I should assume that the satellite is moving in a circular motion around earth, and that it fulfills the same quantization conditions as the Bohr model of the Hydrogen atom.

So far, I started by calculating the total energy of the system, but using a gravitational potential instead of the Coulomb potential, which gives me a total energy of:

E=mr^{2}\omega^{2}-G\frac{mM}{r}

Then, by using the centripetal force and the gravitational force (to find an equilibrium between the two), I got:

G\frac{mM}{r^{2}}=mr\omega^{2}

Substituting this into the energy expression gives:

E=\frac{1}{2}G\frac{mM}{r}-G\frac{mM}{r}

The total energy then becomes:

E=-G\frac{mM}{2r}

... After this, I'm stuck. As far as I can see (using the book that I have in this course), Bohr postulated that the emitted radiation from the hydrogen atom has a frequency which is given by:

E_{n}-E_{n'}=hf

... Where E_{n} is given by:

E_{n}=-\frac{Rhc}{n^{2}}

My thought was that the total energy expression which I calculated must be for a specific value of n, so what I tried was to set my expression equal to E_{n} and then calculate the quantum number n from this relationship. This yielded:

n=\sqrt{\frac{2rRhc}{GmM}}

...However, I'm not even sure that this is a reasonable approach. What especially bothers me is the Rydberg Constant. Can I use a standardized value on this, or do I have to recalculate it so that it too depends on a gravitational force?

I'm really stuck on this one (I think)... Any help is truly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bohr used the quantization condition that the angular momentum of the "orbitting" electron be an integer multiple of \hbar. I imagine you are expected to apply the same condition to the orbitting satellite.
 
Well, that sure reduced the calculations a lot :P
Thanks for the help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top