Can a Single Rectifier Keep an LED Constantly On?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tobi101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rectifier
AI Thread Summary
Connecting an LED to a single rectifier results in a pulsating light due to the half-wave rectification, which operates at 60 Hz, making the pulsation imperceptible to the human eye. A bridge rectifier is more efficient, providing a smoother output at 120 Hz. Adding a capacitor across the rectifier's output can stabilize the voltage, resulting in a brighter and more constant LED illumination. Without this capacitor, the LED requires high current pulses to appear bright. Therefore, while a single rectifier can work, using a bridge rectifier with a capacitor is recommended for optimal performance.
tobi101
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If an LED is connected to a single rectifier, resulting in a half wave, will this cause the LED to pulsate?!
I no a bridge-rectifier will work and is more efficient to keep the LED constantly on but can a single rectifier work?
thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, it does pulsate, but it is still at 60 Hz so you can't see it. A bridge or full wave rectifier gives 120 Hz from a 60 Hz supply.

You can add a capacitor across the output of the rectifier and get a steady DC voltage. This is worth doing and results in brighter output.

Without the capacitor (maybe 1000 uF) the LED has to get high current pulses to appear bright.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top