Can a Solid Reach Equilibrium Below the Triple Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
A solid can exist in equilibrium below the triple point temperature only if the pressure is sufficiently high, allowing for the presence of both solid and liquid phases. Below the triple point pressure, liquid cannot form; instead, only solid and gas phases are possible. The molecular dynamics suggest that liquids require external pressure to maintain their state, as lower pressures lead to evaporation or solidification. For water, a minimum pressure of 612 Pa is necessary to keep it in liquid form, as lower pressures cannot sufficiently bind the molecules together. Ultimately, at very low temperatures, gas formation becomes impossible, highlighting the complex interplay of temperature and pressure in phase behavior.
member 392791
How is it that a solid can be in equilibrium below the triple point? Why can't liquid form? It seems odd to me that the molecules can go to a vapor, but not a liquid. It seems like the molecules can sublime more freely than they can melt. Can someone explain this from a molecular view point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is my question nonsensical??
 
Depends on what you mean by below.

For temperature below the temperature of triple point ##T_c##, there can be equilibrium of solid with liquid, provided the pressure is high enough, although the region reaches only few degrees below ##T_c##.

See the phase diagram here:

http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/phase.html


For the pressure below the pressure of triple point ##p_c##, indeed there can be no liquid. Instead, there can be only solid, gas, or both.

Why gas and not liquid, is a good question. I do not know the full answer from molecular point of view, but here is what I know.

In principle liquids always exist thanks to some external pressure. In lake there is liquid water thanks to the atmospheric pressure - without atmosphere, the water would start to boil and evaporate away.

Liquids are always prepared to evaporate, since their molecules move chaotically and there are always some that have necessary escape velocity. So there has to be something that prevents that escape, a vessel of finite volume or the atmospheric pressure great enough to prevent boiling.

It turns out that for liquid water, the lowest pressure capable to do that is 612 Pa; the character of forces between the water molecules is such that lower pressure is simply not sufficient to keep the molecules tied together in liquid form. They either evaporate, or become part of the crystal, where they are kept by appreciably stronger forces than in the liquid.

(If the pressure is lowered down further, even the solid crystal can turn into gas, but this has limit, since below 200 K there seems to be no gas possible. (Again, hard to explain why exactly...))
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top