Can a Tiny Antenna Transmit Long Wavelength EM Waves?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Transmitting electromagnetic (EM) waves with an antenna significantly smaller than its wavelength is possible, but results in minuscule power output, making detection nearly impossible. For effective transmission, the antenna must be matched to the impedance of the transmitter, typically 50 ohms. While smaller antennas can be used for higher frequencies (e.g., 20 GHz requires a 3-4 mm antenna), efficiency drops drastically for antennas less than a quarter wavelength of the signal. The discussion emphasizes that conventional antennas cannot generate gamma rays, as they require different generation methods like nuclear decay.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Knowledge of antenna impedance matching
  • Familiarity with frequency and wavelength relationships
  • Basic principles of radio frequency (RF) transmission
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Antenna impedance matching techniques" for improved transmission efficiency.
  • Explore "Antenna design for higher frequency applications" to understand miniaturization strategies.
  • Study "Gamma-ray generation methods" to learn about alternatives to conventional antennas.
  • Investigate "Electromagnetic wave propagation in different media" for a broader understanding of wave behavior.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and hobbyists interested in antenna design, radio frequency communication, and electromagnetic theory will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
lucas_ said:
So this is the reason why visible light can't be emitted by antenna?
no exception?

View attachment 246298How about chest x-ray machine. How do they direct the x-ray? nuclear decay since antenna not possible?

Visible light can be received by fairly conventional antennas at the nano-scale so if we can't emit visible light from an antenna it's not because of a physics limitation on EM antenna dipole radiation at that wavelength.
https://www.me.gatech.edu/featured_colarectenna
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
davenn said:
NO, it's dangerous
And expensive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #33
davenn said:
A little matching will do the trick
And a massive amount of copper in the ground mat, of course. That would count as the antenna, I suppose.
The VLF transmitting station at Rugby is another example of a notionally 'small' antenna in terms of wavelength. It has a long history of different installations, from as low frequency as 16kHz. One of the arrays transmitted on 60kHz (5km wavelength) and the antenna consisted of a number of 260m masts. That MSF signal did go a long way! The actual size of the array would be open to interpretation but it certainly was hard work going lower than a quarter wave.
But these small arrays did actually work and provide(d) usable services.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
930