I Can a Tower of Books Move with Lighter Forces?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a stack of books and the forces acting on them. It clarifies that the "last book" refers to the bottom book in the stack, which exerts a force on the surface equal to N=nmg. When considering the application of force, the placement of that force affects the motion of the stack, as pushing below the center of mass is generally easier than at the top. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of clear terminology, suggesting the use of "top book" and "bottom book" for clarity. Overall, the interaction of forces in a stack of books is complex and influenced by the distribution of weight and the point of force application.
Clockclocle
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Suppose n book stack on each other. Since each book have the same weigh then the last book exert a force N=nmg on the surface so it has the biggest static friction. But if we treat the whole tower of books as one particle it also has N=nmg. This mean if we exert enough force in the last book, the tower keep moving as we exert lighter force on all the book at the same time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clockclocle said:
the last book exert a force N=nmg on the surface
The last book does not make contact with the surface. It exerts a friction force only on the book it's on top of.

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
The last book does not make contact with the surface. It exerts a friction force only on the book it's on top of.
What? I think the last book would both contact with the surface and the top of it?
 
I think the OP is using "last book" to mean the one at the bottom of the stack. (I would call the top one the last book, since it was the last one placed on the stack, but the question makes more sense if it means the bottom book.)

In that case, the answer to the question depends on what idealisation you make. If you idealise the books as non-compressible and much wider than the stack is tall so there's no significant difference in torque between the two cases, then yes you can get the same motion by applying ##n## forces of magnitude ##F## or one of magnitude ##nF##.

In reality, books are typically slightly compressible and a stack of books will frequently be taller than it is wide. In that case where you apply the force matters because it will change how the weight is distributed which may affect how easily it slides. It's a fairly common experience that pushing something at a point below its center of mass is easier than pushing it at the top.
 
Last edited:
Clockclocle said:
Suppose n book stack on each other
This is not possible: you can place a book on top of another book, but then the lower book is not on top of the top one. Langauge .. :rolleyes:

Clockclocle said:
What? I think the last book would both contact with the surface and the top of it?
It seems we mean different things when we mention 'the last book'. Langauge ... :rolleyes:

Easier to only use 'top book' and 'bottom book'. Even better to make a sketch to clarify.

Clockclocle said:
This mean if we exert enough force in the last book, the tower keep moving as we exert lighter force on all the book at the same time?
Could you now clarify your question ? I have difficuty understanding the last part...

(and let's assume the books all behave as identical ideal incompressible blocks, with a friction coefficient ##\mu## -- both between books and between bottom book and table. OK?)

##\ ##
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top