Can a U-tube with a moving piston maintain continuity in fluid flow?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a U-tube filled with an incompressible fluid, focusing on the dynamics of fluid flow when a piston divides the fluid into two segments. Participants explore the implications of the piston's movement on fluid continuity, boundary conditions, and equilibrium in various configurations of the U-tube.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the fluid particles near the piston's faces may be considered as points on a streamline, questioning whether the piston can be neglected in fluid mechanics.
  • Another participant counters that the piston's surface introduces a no-slip boundary condition, which cannot be ignored, and questions the assumption that points '1' and '2' have the same velocity.
  • A third participant notes that the presence of the piston performing work complicates the situation, especially in the context of gravity affecting fluid dynamics.
  • In a follow-up, a participant presents a specific problem involving two cases of a U-tube with unequal working areas and asks whether forces or pressures must be equal for equilibrium.
  • Another participant responds by discussing the conditions for equilibrium, emphasizing that at equilibrium, the sum of forces and torques must be zero, and that pressure gradients must not exist.
  • A later reply clarifies that if fluid columns are of equal height, the pressure at each piston's face is equal, but the forces will differ due to varying areas, leading to a lack of equilibrium if the heights are the same.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of the piston and the conditions for equilibrium in the U-tube system. There is no consensus on whether the piston's effects can be neglected or how equilibrium should be defined in the context of unequal working areas.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about fluid behavior, the effects of gravity, and the implications of different configurations of the U-tube, which remain unresolved and may depend on specific conditions not fully articulated by participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in fluid mechanics, particularly those studying the dynamics of U-tube manometers or related systems, may find this discussion relevant.

rupam_iit
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Please consider a U-tube filled with an incompressible fluid as in the attached figure. Piston P divides the fluid in two segments. When P moves, the fluid particles on immediate vicinity of either face (points marked 1 and 2) will have same velocity.

Does this mean, they may considered to be the same point on a streamline ? Or, can the piston be neglected and the entire fluid mass be considered continuous from fluid mechanics point of view ?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
It's tough to say exactly- the surface of the piston introduces a boundary condition (no slip) that is not present otherwise, so I don't think it can be neglected.

Also, I'm not sure it's true that points '1' and '2' will have the same velocity, even up to a sign difference. On one side of the piston there is compressive stress, on the other tension. Since (the way you have drawn the figure) no fluid can move around the piston, the dynamics of each arm will be different, especially if gravity is present.
 
A streamline (in the Bernoulli sense) implies that no work is being done, but the piston would be peforming work if there's any resistance to the movement of the fluid, such as gravity as pointed out by the previous post.
 
Thanks Jeff and Andy,

I will now put the actual problem which prompted me to clear up the above confusion. Please refer to fig. "piston2.bmp". In both the cases, equal columns of water are on either side of the piston with unequal working areas. In Case 1, the connection is rigid while in Case 2, it is a spring coupling.

Now, for equilibrium, will the forces (h*A) have to be equal on both sides (here, h is the height of the water column), or just pressure (h) must be equal, irrespective of the piston working area.

In which case, which one will happen ? I'm totally confused :confused:. Please help and thanks in advance :smile:
 

Attachments

This second problem is also a little unclear, but it looks like you are studying how a U-tube manometer works:

http://www.practicalphysics.org/go/Experiment_878.html;jsessionid=alZLdQlAHb1

At equilibrium, the sum of the forces and torques are zero. In terms of the fluids, it means there is no pressure gradient present, and no flow- each piston opposes the same pressure (force/area). This is not a contradiction with balancing the total force on each face of the two pistons, which you can verify for yourself. Replacing the rigid connection with a spring will introduce an enormous amount of complexity to the dynamical problem, although it could be a good homework problem...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rupam_iit said:
Thanks Jeff and Andy,

I will now put the actual problem which prompted me to clear up the above confusion. Please refer to fig. "piston2.bmp". In both the cases, equal columns of water are on either side of the piston with unequal working areas. In Case 1, the connection is rigid while in Case 2, it is a spring coupling.

Now, for equilibrium, will the forces (h*A) have to be equal on both sides (here, h is the height of the water column), or just pressure (h) must be equal, irrespective of the piston working area.

In which case, which one will happen ? I'm totally confused :confused:. Please help and thanks in advance :smile:

If the fluid columns are the same height (and the same density of fluid is used in each), the pressure at the center of each piston face is equal. Since F = PA, and P is the same, the force (F) will be greater for the piston with the larger surface area. Thus, they will not be in equilibrium if the fluid columns are of the same height.

For example, if the pistons are locked in place, and fluid is placed in each tube to the same height, once the pistons are unlocked, the one with the larger area will push the smaller one causing the fluid columns to adjust their heights until equilibrium is achieved (i.e. the smaller piston's column will rise and the larger piston's column will fall).

Whether it is a rigid bar or spring connecting them makes no difference.

BTW, the pressure is equal pgh (p is fluid density, g is gravitational acceleration, h is height). Also, I'm neglecting frictional effects of the piston seals.

Hope this helps.

CS
 
Thanks a lot, the problem is cleared :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
20K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K